-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29k
[SPARK-21414] Refine SlidingWindowFunctionFrame to avoid OOM. #18634
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -356,6 +356,46 @@ class SQLWindowFunctionSuite extends QueryTest with SharedSQLContext { | |
| spark.catalog.dropTempView("nums") | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| test("window function: mutiple window expressions specified by range in a single expression") { | ||
| val nums = sparkContext.parallelize(1 to 10).map(x => (x, x % 2)).toDF("x", "y") | ||
| nums.createOrReplaceTempView("nums") | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. wrap your test with
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. BTW this test is not very related to this PR, just improves test coverage for range window frame.
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. And this test case doesn't cover when CurrentRow is not in the window frame. We'd better add that senario.
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Sure, I will add it later today. |
||
| withTempView("nums") { | ||
| val expected = | ||
| Row(1, 1, 1, 4, null, 8, 25) :: | ||
| Row(1, 3, 4, 9, 1, 12, 24) :: | ||
| Row(1, 5, 9, 15, 4, 16, 21) :: | ||
| Row(1, 7, 16, 21, 8, 9, 16) :: | ||
| Row(1, 9, 25, 16, 12, null, 9) :: | ||
| Row(0, 2, 2, 6, null, 10, 30) :: | ||
| Row(0, 4, 6, 12, 2, 14, 28) :: | ||
| Row(0, 6, 12, 18, 6, 18, 24) :: | ||
| Row(0, 8, 20, 24, 10, 10, 18) :: | ||
| Row(0, 10, 30, 18, 14, null, 10) :: | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. BTW, please make sure there is no behavior change, i.e. the result should be same with or without this PR.
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
|
||
| Nil | ||
|
|
||
| val actual = sql( | ||
| """ | ||
| |SELECT | ||
| | y, | ||
| | x, | ||
| | sum(x) over w1 as history_sum, | ||
| | sum(x) over w2 as period_sum1, | ||
| | sum(x) over w3 as period_sum2, | ||
| | sum(x) over w4 as period_sum3, | ||
| | sum(x) over w5 as future_sum | ||
| |FROM nums | ||
| |WINDOW | ||
| | w1 AS (PARTITION BY y ORDER BY x RANGE BETWEEN UNBOUNDED PRECEDING AND CURRENT ROW), | ||
| | w2 AS (PARTITION BY y ORDER BY x RANGE BETWEEN 2 PRECEDING AND 2 FOLLOWING), | ||
| | w3 AS (PARTITION BY y ORDER BY x RANGE BETWEEN 4 PRECEDING AND 2 PRECEDING ), | ||
| | w4 AS (PARTITION BY y ORDER BY x RANGE BETWEEN 2 FOLLOWING AND 4 FOLLOWING), | ||
| | w5 AS (PARTITION BY y ORDER BY x RANGE BETWEEN CURRENT ROW AND UNBOUNDED FOLLOWING) | ||
| """.stripMargin | ||
| ) | ||
| checkAnswer(actual, expected) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| test("SPARK-7595: Window will cause resolve failed with self join") { | ||
| checkAnswer(sql( | ||
| """ | ||
|
|
||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How about:
?