Skip to content

Conversation

@felixcheung
Copy link
Member

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

R version update

How was this patch tested?

AppVeyor

Copy link
Member

@HyukjinKwon HyukjinKwon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM if the tests pass

@HyukjinKwon
Copy link
Member

@felixcheung, BTW, I think optionally we could also consider setting it 3.4.0 a bit more conservatively for now. There was a rather minor problem for using the latest version (see #15709) due to sync'ing issue of R version, which was fixed within few hours outside Spark IIRC. Either way is fine to me.

@felixcheung
Copy link
Member Author

felixcheung commented Aug 6, 2017 via email

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Aug 6, 2017

Test build #80291 has finished for PR 18856 at commit 2449e7e.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@HyukjinKwon
Copy link
Member

Ah, I meant, the PR I linked actually describes a case when we were using 3.3.1 but it was broken after 3.3.2 release. The reason was, 3.3.2 was released but 3.3.2 for Windows was not synced (but was synced after few hours).

The script we are using checks if it is latest or not and adds ../old/.. part to build the download link correctly. So..

But, the issue was, https://rversions.r-pkg.org/r-release gives 3.3.2 after the release but 3.3.1 for WIndows was not in old repo as the latest.

@HyukjinKwon
Copy link
Member

HyukjinKwon commented Aug 6, 2017

To cut this short, it was ...

  • 3.3.2 release for Linux only
  • Gives the latest as 3.3.2 and the download link for 3.3.1 becomes windows/base/old
  • 3.3.2 release for WIndows yet
  • 3.3.1 is still not in windows/base/old but windows/base
  • Failed to download

This should be minor anyway and I think usually they should be synced quite soon.

@HyukjinKwon
Copy link
Member

@felixcheung, actually, should we try to replace http://rversions.r-pkg.org/r-release in line 29 to http://rversions.r-pkg.org/r-release-win? I referred krlmlr/r-appveyor@01ce943

@HyukjinKwon
Copy link
Member

Will try to open a separate PR. LGTM.

@asfgit asfgit closed this in d4e7f20 Aug 6, 2017
@HyukjinKwon
Copy link
Member

Merged to master.

@felixcheung
Copy link
Member Author

felixcheung commented Aug 6, 2017 via email

@HyukjinKwon
Copy link
Member

I agree this PR should be okay alone, which fixes what it targets for now and I realised my suggestion is rather an extra bit. I opened another one for replacing r-release to r-release-win.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants