Skip to content

Conversation

@marmbrus
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Aug 26, 2014

QA tests have started for PR 2147 at commit 18ce029.

  • This patch merges cleanly.

@aarondav
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM, will merge pending tests.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Aug 26, 2014

QA tests have started for PR 2147 at commit 8da4414.

  • This patch merges cleanly.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Aug 26, 2014

QA tests have finished for PR 2147 at commit 8da4414.

  • This patch fails unit tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Aug 26, 2014

QA tests have finished for PR 2147 at commit 18ce029.

  • This patch passes unit tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@aarondav
Copy link
Contributor

Test failure:

[info] - Self-join cached *** FAILED ***
[info]   java.lang.NullPointerException:
[info]   at org.apache.spark.sql.columnar.InMemoryRelation.statistics$lzycompute(InMemoryColumnarTableScan.scala:43)
[info]   at org.apache.spark.sql.columnar.InMemoryRelation.statistics(InMemoryColumnarTableScan.scala:42)
[info]   at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkStrategies$HashJoin$.apply(SparkStrategies.scala:78)
[info]   at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.planning.QueryPlanner$$anonfun$1.apply(QueryPlanner.scala:58)
[info]   at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.planning.QueryPlanner$$anonfun$1.apply(QueryPlanner.scala:58)
[info]   at scala.collection.Iterator$$anon$13.hasNext(Iterator.scala:371)
[info]   at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.planning.QueryPlanner.apply(QueryPlanner.scala:59)
[info]   at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.planning.QueryPlanner.planLater(QueryPlanner.scala:54)
[info]   at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkStrategies$BasicOperators$.apply(SparkStrategies.scala:268)
[info]   at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.planning.QueryPlanner$$anonfun$1.apply(QueryPlanner.scala:58)
[info]   ...

@marmbrus
Copy link
Contributor Author

@aarondav provides more useful output than @SparkQA ... :)

Conflicts:
	sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/LogicalPlan.scala
@marmbrus
Copy link
Contributor Author

ok to test

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Aug 27, 2014

QA tests have started for PR 2147 at commit 5390360.

  • This patch merges cleanly.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Aug 27, 2014

QA tests have finished for PR 2147 at commit 5390360.

  • This patch passes unit tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds the following public classes (experimental):
    • case class MutableLiteral(var value: Any, dataType: DataType, nullable: Boolean = true)

asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2014
Author: Michael Armbrust <michael@databricks.com>

Closes #2147 from marmbrus/inMemDefaultSize and squashes the following commits:

5390360 [Michael Armbrust] Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into inMemDefaultSize
14204d3 [Michael Armbrust] Set the context before creating SparkLogicalPlans.
8da4414 [Michael Armbrust] Make sure we throw errors when leaf nodes fail to provide statistcs
18ce029 [Michael Armbrust] Ensure in-memory tables don't always broadcast.

(cherry picked from commit 7d2a7a9)
Signed-off-by: Michael Armbrust <michael@databricks.com>
@asfgit asfgit closed this in 7d2a7a9 Aug 27, 2014
xiliu82 pushed a commit to xiliu82/spark that referenced this pull request Sep 4, 2014
Author: Michael Armbrust <michael@databricks.com>

Closes apache#2147 from marmbrus/inMemDefaultSize and squashes the following commits:

5390360 [Michael Armbrust] Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into inMemDefaultSize
14204d3 [Michael Armbrust] Set the context before creating SparkLogicalPlans.
8da4414 [Michael Armbrust] Make sure we throw errors when leaf nodes fail to provide statistcs
18ce029 [Michael Armbrust] Ensure in-memory tables don't always broadcast.
@marmbrus marmbrus deleted the inMemDefaultSize branch September 22, 2014 19:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants