Skip to content

Conversation

@mgaido91
Copy link
Contributor

@mgaido91 mgaido91 commented Oct 4, 2018

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

The PR changes the test introduced for SPARK-22226, so that we don't run analysis and optimization on the plan. The scope of the test is code generation and running the above mentioned operation is expensive and useless for the test.

The UT was also moved to the CodeGenerationSuite which is a better place given the scope of the test.

How was this patch tested?

running the UT before SPARK-22226 fails, after it passes. The execution time is about 50% the original one. On my laptop this means that the test now runs in about 23 seconds (instead of 50 seconds).

@mgaido91
Copy link
Contributor Author

mgaido91 commented Oct 4, 2018

cc @gatorsmile

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Oct 4, 2018

Test build #96941 has finished for PR 22629 at commit 2cdb7e4.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

Copy link
Member

@gatorsmile gatorsmile left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Thanks! Merged to master

@asfgit asfgit closed this in 85a9359 Oct 5, 2018
jackylee-ch pushed a commit to jackylee-ch/spark that referenced this pull request Feb 18, 2019
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

The PR changes the test introduced for SPARK-22226, so that we don't run analysis and optimization on the plan. The scope of the test is code generation and running the above mentioned operation is expensive and useless for the test.

The UT was also moved to the `CodeGenerationSuite` which is a better place given the scope of the test.

## How was this patch tested?

running the UT before SPARK-22226 fails, after it passes. The execution time is about 50% the original one. On my laptop this means that the test now runs in about 23 seconds (instead of 50 seconds).

Closes apache#22629 from mgaido91/SPARK-25609.

Authored-by: Marco Gaido <marcogaido91@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants