Skip to content

Conversation

@rxin
Copy link
Contributor

@rxin rxin commented Sep 30, 2014

No description provided.

@rxin
Copy link
Contributor Author

rxin commented Sep 30, 2014

We should also cherrypick this into branch-1.0.

Master branch has been fixed in #2588

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21024/

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Sep 30, 2014

QA tests have started for PR 2591 at commit ab99cc0.

  • This patch merges cleanly.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Sep 30, 2014

QA tests have finished for PR 2591 at commit ab99cc0.

  • This patch passes unit tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@rxin
Copy link
Contributor Author

rxin commented Sep 30, 2014

Merging this in branch-1.1 and branch-1.0.

asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 30, 2014
…operly back to the driver (for branch-1.1)

Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@apache.org>

Closes #2591 from rxin/SPARK-3709-1.1 and squashes the following commits:

ab99cc0 [Reynold Xin] [SPARK-3709] Executors don't always report broadcast block removal properly back to the driver

(cherry picked from commit a8c6e82)
Signed-off-by: Reynold Xin <rxin@apache.org>
asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 30, 2014
…operly back to the driver (for branch-1.1)

Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@apache.org>

Closes #2591 from rxin/SPARK-3709-1.1 and squashes the following commits:

ab99cc0 [Reynold Xin] [SPARK-3709] Executors don't always report broadcast block removal properly back to the driver
@rxin rxin closed this Sep 30, 2014
@rxin rxin deleted the SPARK-3709-1.1 branch September 30, 2014 20:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants