[SPARK-30430][PYTHON][DOCS] Add a note that UserDefinedFunction's constructor is private #27101
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Test build #116145 has finished for PR 27101 at commit
|
Member
Author
|
I'm going to merge this. It's pretty clear - it matches with Scala side, and it's doc-only change. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds a note that UserDefinedFunction's constructor is private.
Why are the changes needed?
To match with Scala side. Scala side does not have it at all.
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Doc only changes but it declares UserDefinedFunction's constructor is private explicitly.
How was this patch tested?
Jenkins