-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29k
[SPARK-31507][SQL] Remove uncommon fields support and update some fields with meaningful names for extract function #28284
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Unlike the PR title, this PR is adding
DAYOFWEEK_ISOnewly. Which platform are you referring forDAYOFWEEK_ISO? IIRC, @gatorsmile commented that we should not consider IBM DB i.Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @dongjoon-hyun, for historical reasons, we have [
dayofweek,dow] implemented for representing a non-ISO day-of-week and a newly addedisodowfrom PostgreSQL for ISO day-of-week. Many other systems only have one week-numbering system support and use either full names or abbreviations. Things in spark become a little bit complicated.isodow, so we need to add iso-prefix todayofweekto make a pair for it too. [dayofweek,isodayofweek,dowandisodow]iso-prefixed systems and more systems chooseiso-suffixed way, so we may result in [dayofweek,dayofweekiso,dow,dowiso]dayofweekisolooks nice and has use cases in the platforms listed above, e.g. snowflake, butdowisolooks weird and no use cases found.isomay look much better becauseisodowis new and there is no standard forisokind of things, so this may be good for us to make it simple and clear for end-users if they are well documented too.Thus, we finally result in [
dayofweek,dow] for Non-ISO week-numbering system and [dayofweek_iso,dow_iso] for ISO systemUh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@yaooqinn . Ya. It's clear for that part. Could you enumerate the name of systems which supports
DAYOFWEEK_ISO? (except IBM DB i). I'm wondering that specifically.It's because you wrote like
Many other systemsin the PR description.Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Specifically, snowflake use dayofweek_iso except db2. I couldn't find more because most platforms do not have two day-of-week system implemented.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Got it. Thanks. I understand that Snowflake is considered important. Could you add some of the above comment(#28284 (comment)) to the PR description then?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
thanks @dongjoon-hyun. PR description updated