-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29k
[SPARK-39027][SQL] Output SQL statements in error messages in upper case and w/o double quotes #36359
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Member
Author
|
@cloud-fan @srielau @HyukjinKwon Could you approve remove double quotes around SQL statements in error messages, please. |
Member
Author
|
cc @srielau |
cloud-fan
approved these changes
Apr 27, 2022
dongjoon-hyun
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 27, 2022
…per case and w/o double quotes ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? In the PR, I propose to output any SQL statement in error messages in upper case, and apply new implementation of `QueryErrorsBase.toSQLStmt()` to all exceptions in `Query.*Errors` w/ error classes. Also this PR modifies all affected tests, see the list in the section "How was this patch tested?". This is a backport of #36359. ### Why are the changes needed? To improve user experience with Spark SQL by highlighting SQL statements in error massage and make them more visible to users. Also this PR makes SQL statements in error messages consistent to the docs where such elements are showed in upper case w/ any quotes. ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? Yes. The changes might influence on error messages: Before: ```sql The operation "DESC PARTITION" is not allowed ``` After: ```sql The operation DESC PARTITION is not allowed ``` ### How was this patch tested? By running affected test suites: ``` $ build/sbt "sql/testOnly *QueryExecutionErrorsSuite" $ build/sbt "sql/testOnly *QueryParsingErrorsSuite" $ build/sbt "sql/testOnly *QueryCompilationErrorsSuite" $ build/sbt "test:testOnly *QueryCompilationErrorsDSv2Suite" $ build/sbt "test:testOnly *ExtractPythonUDFFromJoinConditionSuite" $ build/sbt "testOnly *PlanParserSuite" $ build/sbt "sql/testOnly *SQLQueryTestSuite -- -z transform.sql" $ build/sbt "sql/testOnly *SQLQueryTestSuite -- -z join-lateral.sql" $ build/sbt "sql/testOnly *SQLQueryTestSuite -- -z describe.sql" $ build/sbt "testOnly *DDLParserSuite" ``` Closes #36363 from MaxGekk/error-class-toSQLStmt-no-quotes-3.3. Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
HyukjinKwon
approved these changes
Apr 27, 2022
Member
Author
|
All GAs passed: https://github.com/MaxGekk/spark/runs/6189050094. Merging to master. |
MaxGekk
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 22, 2022
### What changes were proposed in this pull request? In the PR, I propose to describe the rules of quoting elements in error messages introduced by the PRs: - #36210 - #36233 - #36259 - #36324 - #36335 - #36359 - #36579 ### Why are the changes needed? To improve code maintenance, and the process of code review. ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No. ### How was this patch tested? By existing GAs. Closes #36621 from MaxGekk/update-error-class-guide. Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
MaxGekk
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 22, 2022
### What changes were proposed in this pull request? In the PR, I propose to describe the rules of quoting elements in error messages introduced by the PRs: - #36210 - #36233 - #36259 - #36324 - #36335 - #36359 - #36579 ### Why are the changes needed? To improve code maintenance, and the process of code review. ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No. ### How was this patch tested? By existing GAs. Closes #36621 from MaxGekk/update-error-class-guide. Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com> (cherry picked from commit 2a4d8a4) Signed-off-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to output any SQL statement in error messages in upper case, and apply new implementation of
QueryErrorsBase.toSQLStmt()to all exceptions inQuery.*Errorsw/ error classes. Also this PR modifies all affected tests, see the list in the section "How was this patch tested?".Why are the changes needed?
To improve user experience with Spark SQL by highlighting SQL statements in error massage and make them more visible to users. Also this PR makes SQL statements in error messages consistent to the docs where such elements are showed in upper case w/ any quotes.
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes. The changes might influence on error messages:
Before:
The operation "DESC PARTITION" is not allowedAfter:
The operation DESC PARTITION is not allowedHow was this patch tested?
By running affected test suites: