Skip to content

Conversation

@itholic
Copy link
Contributor

@itholic itholic commented Nov 1, 2022

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR proposes to make the manual tests for DataFrame.corrwith back into formal approach, if the pandas version is not 1.5.0.

Why are the changes needed?

There was a regression introduced by pandas 1.5.0 (pandas-dev/pandas#48826), and seems it's resolved now.

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No.

How was this patch tested?

The fixed test should pass the CI.

@HyukjinKwon HyukjinKwon changed the title [SPARK-40827][PS][TEST] Re-enable the DataFrame.corrwith test after fixing in future pandas. [SPARK-40827][PS][TESTS] Re-enable the DataFrame.corrwith test after fixing in future pandas. Nov 1, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@zhengruifeng zhengruifeng left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm pending ci

@itholic
Copy link
Contributor Author

itholic commented Nov 1, 2022

Thanks for the review :-)

@HyukjinKwon
Copy link
Member

Merged to master.

SandishKumarHN pushed a commit to SandishKumarHN/spark that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2022
…fixing in future pandas

### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR proposes to make the manual tests for `DataFrame.corrwith` back into formal approach, if the pandas version is not 1.5.0.

### Why are the changes needed?

There was a regression introduced by pandas 1.5.0 (pandas-dev/pandas#48826), and seems it's resolved now.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No.

### How was this patch tested?

The fixed test should pass the CI.

Closes apache#38455 from itholic/SPARK-40827.

Authored-by: itholic <haejoon.lee@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
@itholic itholic deleted the SPARK-40827 branch April 22, 2023 05:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants