-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29k
[SPARK-40877][DOC][FOLLOW-UP] Update the doc of DataFrame.stat.crosstab
#38579
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
cc @HyukjinKwon |
| """ | ||
| Computes a pair-wise frequency table of the given columns. Also known as a contingency | ||
| table. The number of distinct values for each column should be less than 1e4. At most 1e6 | ||
| non-zero pair frequencies will be returned. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we can just remove this and don't add .. versionchanged:: 3.4.0. It's sort of improvement, and trivial to mention.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
got it
HyukjinKwon
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Co-authored-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
|
merged into master |
…tab ` ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? remove the outdated comments ### Why are the changes needed? the limitations are not true after [reimplementation](apache#38340) ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? yes ### How was this patch tested? doc - only Closes apache#38579 from zhengruifeng/doc_crosstab. Lead-authored-by: Ruifeng Zheng <ruifengz@apache.org> Co-authored-by: Ruifeng Zheng <ruifengz@foxmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ruifeng Zheng <ruifengz@apache.org>
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
remove the outdated comments
Why are the changes needed?
the limitations are not true after reimplementation
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
yes
How was this patch tested?
doc - only