Skip to content

Conversation

@tobiasstadler
Copy link
Contributor

@tobiasstadler tobiasstadler commented Dec 22, 2022

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Upgrade Apache Ivy from 2.5.0 to 2.5.1

Why are the changes needed?

CVE-2022-37865
and
CVE-2022-37866

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No.

How was this patch tested?

Pass GA

@github-actions github-actions bot added the BUILD label Dec 22, 2022
@tobiasstadler tobiasstadler changed the title [SPARK-41686][BUILD] Updated ivy to 2.5.1 [SPARK-41686][BUILD] Upgrade Apache Ivy to 2.5.1 Dec 22, 2022
@HyukjinKwon
Copy link
Member

@tobiasstadler mind creating a PR against master branch? We can backport the change to other branches.

@tobiasstadler
Copy link
Contributor Author

@HyukjinKwon This is actually a backport of SPARK-41030.

@HyukjinKwon HyukjinKwon changed the title [SPARK-41686][BUILD] Upgrade Apache Ivy to 2.5.1 [SPARK-41686][SPARK-41030][BUILD][3.3] Upgrade Apache Ivy to 2.5.1 Dec 22, 2022
@HyukjinKwon
Copy link
Member

Merged to branch-3.3.

HyukjinKwon pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 22, 2022
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Upgrade Apache Ivy from 2.5.0 to 2.5.1

### Why are the changes needed?
[CVE-2022-37865](https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-37865)
and
[CVE-2022-37866](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-37866)

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.

### How was this patch tested?
Pass GA

Closes #39176 from tobiasstadler/SPARK-41686.

Authored-by: Tobias Stadler <ts.stadler@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
@tobiasstadler
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thank you!

Copy link
Member

@dongjoon-hyun dongjoon-hyun left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1, late LGTM.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants