Skip to content

Conversation

@gengliangwang
Copy link
Member

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Similar with #37327, this PR renames the JDBC data source option inferTimestampNTZType as preferTimestampNTZ

Why are the changes needed?

It is simpler and more straightforward. Also, it is consistent with the CSV data source option introduced in #37327,

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No, the TimestampNTZ project is not released yet.

How was this patch tested?

UT

@gengliangwang
Copy link
Member Author

cc @sadikovi @HyukjinKwon

@HyukjinKwon
Copy link
Member

Merged to master and branch-3.4.

HyukjinKwon pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 16, 2023
…TimestampNTZ

Similar with #37327, this PR renames the JDBC data source option `inferTimestampNTZType` as `preferTimestampNTZ`

It is simpler and more straightforward. Also, it is consistent with the CSV data source option introduced in #37327,

No, the TimestampNTZ project is not released yet.

UT

Closes #40042 from gengliangwang/inferNTZOption.

Authored-by: Gengliang Wang <gengliang@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
(cherry picked from commit 8194522)
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
snmvaughan pushed a commit to snmvaughan/spark that referenced this pull request Jun 20, 2023
…TimestampNTZ

Similar with apache#37327, this PR renames the JDBC data source option `inferTimestampNTZType` as `preferTimestampNTZ`

It is simpler and more straightforward. Also, it is consistent with the CSV data source option introduced in apache#37327,

No, the TimestampNTZ project is not released yet.

UT

Closes apache#40042 from gengliangwang/inferNTZOption.

Authored-by: Gengliang Wang <gengliang@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
(cherry picked from commit 8194522)
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants