Skip to content

Conversation

@srowen
Copy link
Member

@srowen srowen commented Feb 11, 2015

This just adds a deprecation message. It's intended for backporting to branch 1.3 but can go in master too, to be followed by another PR that removes it for 1.4.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Feb 11, 2015

Test build #27249 has started for PR 4516 at commit 6c1c8b3.

  • This patch merges cleanly.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Feb 11, 2015

Test build #27249 has finished for PR 4516 at commit 6c1c8b3.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/27249/
Test PASSed.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we maybe just say "in Spark 1.4"? It might be good to set expectations conservatively... no harm if we decide to keep it longer.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, will do. That sounds like a good idea.

asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 11, 2015
This just adds a deprecation message. It's intended for backporting to branch 1.3 but can go in master too, to be followed by another PR that removes it for 1.4.

Author: Sean Owen <sowen@cloudera.com>

Closes #4516 from srowen/SPARK-5727.1 and squashes the following commits:

d48989f [Sean Owen] Refer to Spark 1.4
6c1c8b3 [Sean Owen] Deprecate Debian packaging

(cherry picked from commit bd0d6e0)
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sowen@cloudera.com>
@asfgit asfgit closed this in bd0d6e0 Feb 11, 2015
@srowen srowen deleted the SPARK-5727.1 branch February 11, 2015 08:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants