Skip to content

[SPARK-3688][SQL] More inline comments for LogicalPlan. #4539

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
rxin wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

[SPARK-3688][SQL] More inline comments for LogicalPlan. #4539

rxin wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

@rxin
Copy link
Contributor

@rxin rxin commented Feb 11, 2015

As a follow-up to #4524

@rxin rxin mentioned this pull request Feb 11, 2015
Closed
@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Feb 11, 2015

Test build #27304 has started for PR 4539 at commit 5ac56c7.

  • This patch merges cleanly.

@marmbrus
Copy link
Contributor

marmbrus commented Feb 11, 2015

LGTM

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Feb 11, 2015

Test build #27304 has finished for PR 4539 at commit 5ac56c7.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

AmplabJenkins commented Feb 11, 2015

Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/27304/
Test PASSed.

asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 11, 2015
@rxin
[SPARK-3688][SQL] More inline comments for LogicalPlan.
08ab3d2 
As a follow-up to #4524

Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>

Closes #4539 from rxin/SPARK-3688 and squashes the following commits:

5ac56c7 [Reynold Xin] exists
da8eea4 [Reynold Xin] [SPARK-3688][SQL] More inline comments for LogicalPlan.

(cherry picked from commit fa6bdc6)
Signed-off-by: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
@asfgit asfgit closed this in fa6bdc6 Feb 11, 2015
@rxin rxin deleted the SPARK-3688 branch February 11, 2015 23:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@rxin @SparkQA @marmbrus @AmplabJenkins