Skip to content

Conversation

@jerryshao
Copy link
Contributor

@srowen
Copy link
Member

srowen commented Feb 27, 2015

Yes that looks good.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Feb 27, 2015

Test build #28032 has started for PR 4800 at commit a2483c2.

  • This patch merges cleanly.

@andrewor14
Copy link
Contributor

Yes, LGTM thanks for fixing this. I'll merge it into master once tests pass.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Feb 27, 2015

Test build #28032 has finished for PR 4800 at commit a2483c2.

  • This patch fails Spark unit tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28032/
Test FAILed.

@andrewor14
Copy link
Contributor

retest this please

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Feb 27, 2015

Test build #28041 has started for PR 4800 at commit a2483c2.

  • This patch merges cleanly.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Feb 27, 2015

Test build #28041 has finished for PR 4800 at commit a2483c2.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28041/
Test PASSed.

@andrewor14
Copy link
Contributor

Per discussion on #4841 I'm reverting this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants