[SPARK-55128][INFRA][FOLLOWUP] Restore SQL tests by pin 'pandas==2.3.3' for maven daily test#53933
Closed
LuciferYang wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
Closed
[SPARK-55128][INFRA][FOLLOWUP] Restore SQL tests by pin 'pandas==2.3.3' for maven daily test#53933LuciferYang wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
LuciferYang wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
Conversation
JIRA Issue Information=== Test SPARK-55128 === This comment was automatically generated by GitHub Actions |
zhengruifeng
approved these changes
Jan 23, 2026
HyukjinKwon
approved these changes
Jan 23, 2026
Contributor
|
thanks, merged to master |
Contributor
Author
|
Thank you @zhengruifeng and @HyukjinKwon |
LuciferYang
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 23, 2026
…3' for maven daily test ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? Similar to #53910, this pr pins the pandas version to 2.3.3. ### Why are the changes needed? To restore SQL tests for maven daily test. - https://github.com/apache/spark/actions/runs/21249870076/job/61148348328 ``` - udf/postgreSQL/udf-case.sql - Scalar Pandas UDF *** FAILED *** udf/postgreSQL/udf-case.sql - Scalar Pandas UDF Python: 3.11 Pandas: 3.0.0 PyArrow: 23.0.0 Expected Some("struct<Two:string,i:int,f:double,i:int,j:int>"), but got Some("struct<>") Schema did not match for query #30 SELECT '' AS `Two`, * FROM CASE_TBL a, CASE2_TBL b WHERE udf(COALESCE(f,b.i) = 2): -- !query SELECT '' AS `Two`, * FROM CASE_TBL a, CASE2_TBL b WHERE udf(COALESCE(f,b.i) = 2) -- !query schema struct<> -- !query output org.apache.spark.SparkRuntimeException { "errorClass" : "CAST_INVALID_INPUT", "sqlState" : "22018", "messageParameters" : { "ansiConfig" : "\"spark.sql.ansi.enabled\"", "expression" : "'nan'", "sourceType" : "\"STRING\"", "targetType" : "\"BOOLEAN\"" }, "queryContext" : [ { "objectType" : "", "objectName" : "", "startIndex" : 62, "stopIndex" : 85, "fragment" : "udf(COALESCE(f,b.i) = 2)" } ] } (SQLQueryTestSuite.scala:681) ``` ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No ### How was this patch tested? monitor maven daily test after pr merged ### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling? No Closes #53933 from LuciferYang/SPARK-55128-FOLLOWUP. Authored-by: yangjie01 <yangjie01@baidu.com> Signed-off-by: Ruifeng Zheng <ruifengz@apache.org> (cherry picked from commit 3f1c9a3) Signed-off-by: yangjie01 <yangjie01@baidu.com>
Contributor
Author
Merged into branch-4.1 too. |
pan3793
pushed a commit
to pan3793/spark
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 11, 2026
…3' for maven daily test Similar to apache#53910, this pr pins the pandas version to 2.3.3. To restore SQL tests for maven daily test. - https://github.com/apache/spark/actions/runs/21249870076/job/61148348328 ``` - udf/postgreSQL/udf-case.sql - Scalar Pandas UDF *** FAILED *** udf/postgreSQL/udf-case.sql - Scalar Pandas UDF Python: 3.11 Pandas: 3.0.0 PyArrow: 23.0.0 Expected Some("struct<Two:string,i:int,f:double,i:int,j:int>"), but got Some("struct<>") Schema did not match for query apache#30 SELECT '' AS `Two`, * FROM CASE_TBL a, CASE2_TBL b WHERE udf(COALESCE(f,b.i) = 2): -- !query SELECT '' AS `Two`, * FROM CASE_TBL a, CASE2_TBL b WHERE udf(COALESCE(f,b.i) = 2) -- !query schema struct<> -- !query output org.apache.spark.SparkRuntimeException { "errorClass" : "CAST_INVALID_INPUT", "sqlState" : "22018", "messageParameters" : { "ansiConfig" : "\"spark.sql.ansi.enabled\"", "expression" : "'nan'", "sourceType" : "\"STRING\"", "targetType" : "\"BOOLEAN\"" }, "queryContext" : [ { "objectType" : "", "objectName" : "", "startIndex" : 62, "stopIndex" : 85, "fragment" : "udf(COALESCE(f,b.i) = 2)" } ] } (SQLQueryTestSuite.scala:681) ``` No monitor maven daily test after pr merged No Closes apache#53933 from LuciferYang/SPARK-55128-FOLLOWUP. Authored-by: yangjie01 <yangjie01@baidu.com> Signed-off-by: Ruifeng Zheng <ruifengz@apache.org>
pan3793
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 11, 2026
Backport #53910 and #53933 to branch-4.0 ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? Pandas 3.0 released, pin 'pandas==2.3.3' to recover the CI. ### Why are the changes needed? Recover CI. ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No. ### How was this patch tested? Wait for GHA result. ### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling? No. Closes #54263 from pan3793/SPARK-55128-4.0. Lead-authored-by: Ruifeng Zheng <ruifengz@apache.org> Co-authored-by: yangjie01 <yangjie01@baidu.com> Signed-off-by: Cheng Pan <chengpan@apache.org>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Similar to #53910, this pr pins the pandas version to 2.3.3.
Why are the changes needed?
To restore SQL tests for maven daily test.
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
How was this patch tested?
monitor maven daily test after pr merged
Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
No