-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29k
[SPARK-8764][ML] string indexer should take option to handle unseen values #7266
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
holdenk
wants to merge
13
commits into
apache:master
from
holdenk:SPARK-8764-string-indexer-should-take-option-to-handle-unseen-values
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
13 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
afecd4e
Add a param to skip invalid entries.
holdenk b5734be
Add support for unseen labels
holdenk d69ef5e
Add a test
holdenk 75ffa69
Remove extra newline
holdenk aa5b093
Since we filter we should never go down this code path if getSkipInva…
holdenk 100a39b
Merge in master
holdenk 7a22215
fix typo
holdenk 1e53f9b
update the param (codegen side)
holdenk 414e249
And switch to using handleInvalid instead of skipInvalid
holdenk 7f37f6e
remove extra space (scala style)
holdenk 81dd312
Update the docs for handleInvalid param to be more descriptive
holdenk 045bf22
Add a second b entry so b gets 0 for sure
holdenk 38a4de9
fix long line
holdenk File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think that
HasSkipInvalidshould be mixed-in withStringIndexerModelrather thanStringIndexerBase. Skipping invalid is really a parameter that can be set for the resulting model and is not used byStringIndexer#fitexcept incopyValuesThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Discussion on L69.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
OK as is, sorry for my mixup