Skip to content

Conversation

@CodingCat
Copy link
Contributor

it might be a typo introduced at the first moment or some leftover after some renaming......

the name of the method accessing the index file is called getBlockData now (not getBlockLocation as indicated in the comments)

@srowen
Copy link
Member

srowen commented Aug 17, 2015

LGTM

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Aug 17, 2015

Test build #41021 timed out for PR 8238 at commit 7874b68 after a configured wait of 175m.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Aug 17, 2015

Test build #41040 has finished for PR 8238 at commit 1aea5c4.

  • This patch fails Spark unit tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@sarutak
Copy link
Member

sarutak commented Aug 18, 2015

retest this please.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Aug 18, 2015

Test build #41090 has finished for PR 8238 at commit 1aea5c4.

  • This patch fails PySpark unit tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@srowen
Copy link
Member

srowen commented Aug 18, 2015

The test failures must be spurious. The fix must be correct since there is no method called getBlockLocation anywhere now. Merging ...

asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 18, 2015
it might be a typo  introduced at the first moment or some leftover after some renaming......

the name of the method accessing the index file is called `getBlockData` now (not `getBlockLocation` as indicated in the comments)

Author: CodingCat <zhunansjtu@gmail.com>

Closes #8238 from CodingCat/minor_1.

(cherry picked from commit c34e9ff)
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sowen@cloudera.com>
@asfgit asfgit closed this in c34e9ff Aug 18, 2015
@CodingCat
Copy link
Contributor Author

thanks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants