Skip to content

Conversation

@HyukjinKwon
Copy link
Member

As discussed #9660 #9060, I cleaned up unused imports, added a test for fixed-length byte array and used a common function for writing metadata for Parquet.

For the test for fixed-length byte array, I have tested and checked the encoding types with parquet-tools.

…metadata and add a test for FIXED_LEN_BYTE_ARRAY
@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Nov 17, 2015

Test build #46046 has finished for PR 9754 at commit dc5ef4f.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@HyukjinKwon
Copy link
Member Author

I will cc you @liancheng just so that you can easily find :).

@liancheng
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for cleaning this up! Merging to master.

@asfgit asfgit closed this in 75d2020 Nov 17, 2015
@liancheng
Copy link
Contributor

@HyukjinKwon This PR doesn't merge cleanly with branch-1.6. Would you please file another PR to backport this change to branch-1.6? Thanks!

@HyukjinKwon
Copy link
Member Author

yes I will!

HyukjinKwon added a commit to HyukjinKwon/spark that referenced this pull request Nov 17, 2015
asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 17, 2015
The main purpose of this PR is to backport #9754

I added several commits but they are identical with the PR.

I will cc liancheng just to find this easily.

Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
Author: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>

Closes #9763 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-11694-followup-backporting.
@HyukjinKwon HyukjinKwon deleted the SPARK-11694-followup branch September 23, 2016 18:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants