Skip to content

Conversation

@BigOneLiu
Copy link
Contributor

@BigOneLiu BigOneLiu commented Oct 17, 2017

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-2780

@revans2 Could you please review my pr? thx

@revans2
Copy link
Contributor

revans2 commented Oct 17, 2017

@BigOneLiu When the task info is created

IMetricsConsumer.TaskInfo taskInfo = new IMetricsConsumer.TaskInfo(
hostname, workerTopologyContext.getThisWorkerPort(),
componentId, taskId, Time.currentTimeSecs(), interval);

The time that is set there is when the metric was sent (in seconds). In most cases it should not take much if any time for it to make its way to the metrics consumer, but if it does the times could be off from one another.

I personally am +1 for this change, because I don't really use this time when I am looking at logged metrics, but if others want it they should speak up.

@BigOneLiu
Copy link
Contributor Author

@vesense
Could you please review my pr?
If it could be an improvement?

@vesense
Copy link
Member

vesense commented Oct 18, 2017

I prefer to Ieave it as it is, since the log time and the taskInfo.timestamp is not same. Perhaps someone uses it, I'm not sure.

@BigOneLiu
Copy link
Contributor Author

BigOneLiu commented Oct 18, 2017

@revans2 @vesense
Actually you can easily get the taskInfo.timestamp(1508207360) from thr date (2017-10-17 10:29:20) ,and Log4j framework has provided more accurate date(2017-10-17 10:29:20,906 126908).
If users who don't know MetricsConsumer read this log file, they may be confused.
So I think it's better to delete it.

@revans2
Copy link
Contributor

revans2 commented Oct 20, 2017

@BigOneLiu actually like I sad they are not coming from the same location. 99.9% of the time they are probably going to be the same underlying value, but if for some reason the metrics tuple is delayed by 1 second they are 100% guaranteed to be different.

@vesense if you are concerned about this that is probably a good enough reason to not do it. Users are going to have enough on their hands going to 2.x where we may even be moving to an entirely new metrics system.

@BigOneLiu
Copy link
Contributor Author

@revans2 like you said 99.9% of the time they are the same,and if the tuple is delayed by 1 second,it's a big problem for storm.maybe you don't need this data then.
vesense's consideration is good enough but I don't mean to delete the attribute in taskInfo.I just delete it from log file in case user get confused.
users can call taskInfo.timestamp whenever they want to use it in new metrics system.
I just concern about this,if you think it's not a good step I would no longer insist.

d2r pushed a commit to d2r/storm that referenced this pull request Oct 16, 2018
We are closing stale Pull Requests to make the list more manageable.

Please re-open any Pull Request that has been closed in error.

Closes apache#608
Closes apache#639
Closes apache#640
Closes apache#648
Closes apache#662
Closes apache#668
Closes apache#692
Closes apache#705
Closes apache#724
Closes apache#728
Closes apache#730
Closes apache#753
Closes apache#803
Closes apache#854
Closes apache#922
Closes apache#986
Closes apache#992
Closes apache#1019
Closes apache#1040
Closes apache#1041
Closes apache#1043
Closes apache#1046
Closes apache#1051
Closes apache#1078
Closes apache#1146
Closes apache#1164
Closes apache#1165
Closes apache#1178
Closes apache#1213
Closes apache#1225
Closes apache#1258
Closes apache#1259
Closes apache#1268
Closes apache#1272
Closes apache#1277
Closes apache#1278
Closes apache#1288
Closes apache#1296
Closes apache#1328
Closes apache#1342
Closes apache#1353
Closes apache#1370
Closes apache#1376
Closes apache#1391
Closes apache#1395
Closes apache#1399
Closes apache#1406
Closes apache#1410
Closes apache#1422
Closes apache#1427
Closes apache#1443
Closes apache#1462
Closes apache#1468
Closes apache#1483
Closes apache#1506
Closes apache#1509
Closes apache#1515
Closes apache#1520
Closes apache#1521
Closes apache#1525
Closes apache#1527
Closes apache#1544
Closes apache#1550
Closes apache#1566
Closes apache#1569
Closes apache#1570
Closes apache#1575
Closes apache#1580
Closes apache#1584
Closes apache#1591
Closes apache#1600
Closes apache#1611
Closes apache#1613
Closes apache#1639
Closes apache#1703
Closes apache#1711
Closes apache#1719
Closes apache#1737
Closes apache#1760
Closes apache#1767
Closes apache#1768
Closes apache#1785
Closes apache#1799
Closes apache#1822
Closes apache#1824
Closes apache#1844
Closes apache#1874
Closes apache#1918
Closes apache#1928
Closes apache#1937
Closes apache#1942
Closes apache#1951
Closes apache#1957
Closes apache#1963
Closes apache#1964
Closes apache#1965
Closes apache#1967
Closes apache#1968
Closes apache#1971
Closes apache#1985
Closes apache#1986
Closes apache#1998
Closes apache#2031
Closes apache#2032
Closes apache#2071
Closes apache#2076
Closes apache#2108
Closes apache#2119
Closes apache#2128
Closes apache#2142
Closes apache#2174
Closes apache#2206
Closes apache#2297
Closes apache#2322
Closes apache#2332
Closes apache#2341
Closes apache#2377
Closes apache#2414
Closes apache#2469
d2r pushed a commit to d2r/storm that referenced this pull request Oct 16, 2018
We are closing stale Pull Requests to make the list more manageable.

Please re-open any Pull Request that has been closed in error.

Closes apache#608
Closes apache#639
Closes apache#640
Closes apache#648
Closes apache#662
Closes apache#668
Closes apache#692
Closes apache#705
Closes apache#724
Closes apache#728
Closes apache#730
Closes apache#753
Closes apache#803
Closes apache#854
Closes apache#922
Closes apache#986
Closes apache#992
Closes apache#1019
Closes apache#1040
Closes apache#1041
Closes apache#1043
Closes apache#1046
Closes apache#1051
Closes apache#1078
Closes apache#1146
Closes apache#1164
Closes apache#1165
Closes apache#1178
Closes apache#1213
Closes apache#1225
Closes apache#1258
Closes apache#1259
Closes apache#1268
Closes apache#1272
Closes apache#1277
Closes apache#1278
Closes apache#1288
Closes apache#1296
Closes apache#1328
Closes apache#1342
Closes apache#1353
Closes apache#1370
Closes apache#1376
Closes apache#1391
Closes apache#1395
Closes apache#1399
Closes apache#1406
Closes apache#1410
Closes apache#1422
Closes apache#1427
Closes apache#1443
Closes apache#1462
Closes apache#1468
Closes apache#1483
Closes apache#1506
Closes apache#1509
Closes apache#1515
Closes apache#1520
Closes apache#1521
Closes apache#1525
Closes apache#1527
Closes apache#1544
Closes apache#1550
Closes apache#1566
Closes apache#1569
Closes apache#1570
Closes apache#1575
Closes apache#1580
Closes apache#1584
Closes apache#1591
Closes apache#1600
Closes apache#1611
Closes apache#1613
Closes apache#1639
Closes apache#1703
Closes apache#1711
Closes apache#1719
Closes apache#1737
Closes apache#1760
Closes apache#1767
Closes apache#1768
Closes apache#1785
Closes apache#1799
Closes apache#1822
Closes apache#1824
Closes apache#1844
Closes apache#1874
Closes apache#1918
Closes apache#1928
Closes apache#1937
Closes apache#1942
Closes apache#1951
Closes apache#1957
Closes apache#1963
Closes apache#1964
Closes apache#1965
Closes apache#1967
Closes apache#1968
Closes apache#1971
Closes apache#1985
Closes apache#1986
Closes apache#1998
Closes apache#2031
Closes apache#2032
Closes apache#2071
Closes apache#2076
Closes apache#2108
Closes apache#2119
Closes apache#2128
Closes apache#2142
Closes apache#2174
Closes apache#2206
Closes apache#2297
Closes apache#2322
Closes apache#2332
Closes apache#2341
Closes apache#2377
Closes apache#2414
Closes apache#2469
@asfgit asfgit closed this in #2880 Oct 22, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants