-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(Indian Map Changes): fixed-Indian-map-border #24927
fix(Indian Map Changes): fixed-Indian-map-border #24927
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @Yaswanth-Perumalla for the PR. Would you mind including before and after screenshots so reviewers can visualize the difference? Also any additional context you can provide in terms of what was wrong and/or why your proposed solution is correct would be helpful. |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #24927 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 69.00% 69.00%
=======================================
Files 1906 1906
Lines 74133 74133
Branches 8208 8208
=======================================
Hits 51153 51153
Misses 20857 20857
Partials 2123 2123
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. 📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more |
@Yaswanth-Perumalla it seems that your updated map may include disputed territories. I think @villebro might have worked on a similar issue in the past and likely should weigh in here. In the case of a dispute I believe we allow all disputing territories include the region in their map. |
We take the stance that disputed areas can be featured on multiple maps, as long as there is an ISO code to back it up. @Yaswanth-Perumalla would you mind adding a reference to where you obtained the updated polygon data for this PR? Also, if you used the Notebook in this repo, it would be nice if you could also update that as part of this PR so that it's in sync with the current state of the rendered map regions. |
@Yaswanth-Perumalla there are a handful of people on Slack very excited to merge this PR. Can you give us a response on @villebro's question above? |
@Yaswanth-Perumalla this is the notebook that's been used to generate most (or all) maps: https://github.com/apache/superset/tree/master/superset-frontend/plugins/legacy-plugin-chart-country-map/scripts Can you check if that generates the correct polygons, and if not, maybe add a note to it so someone doesn't overwrite these in the future. |
@villebro I have updated the notes. Kindly check and let me know if you need any further changes. |
@rusackas I've encountered a failed check after making updates to the notes. Can you assist me in understanding the problem? |
If you check the failed CI workflow, it appears to complain about a missing newline at the end of the file. If you need help resolving it I can help, but feel free to take a stab at it first. |
1 similar comment
If you check the failed CI workflow, it appears to complain about a missing newline at the end of the file. If you need help resolving it I can help, but feel free to take a stab at it first. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, thanks for your patience
The map of India is incorrect after upgrading to version 4.0.1 |
Eek! If you want to open a PR, feel free, but we'll try to assess/fix ASAP. I even wrote a blog post about how to make such a contribution, and how we're trying to be better about keeping these things current and permanent. |
Hi i have raised a PR that restores changes that were made in this PR using the new GeoJson Generator script ! cc @amanmaurya |
SUMMARY
The previous Indian border was inaccurate, and I've now made the required adjustments to the existing border of India.
BEFORE
AFTER
TESTING INSTRUCTIONS
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Bug references:
Closes #20452
Closes #19729