-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Relay][FrontEnd][MxNet] incorrect data_min_idx and data_max_idx in _qnn_conv #4831
Comments
cc @kevinthesun @zhiics can you help check on this ? |
yeah, it looks flipped to me as well. @shoubhik can you confirm? Thanks. |
taking a look at it. |
Thanks for finding the bug @GuoliangLiCN |
yes, it does needs a flipping. the test case passes because the scale value remains the same. I'll send a PR a little later. |
What is the state of this issue? @anijain2305 @shoubhik |
sorry got swamped. I will definitely send a fix on Monday. |
…pped. Existing test cases cover this fix. In addition I have added an assert to make sure that the data_min is always less than equal to data_max.
…5136) Existing test cases cover this fix. In addition I have added an assert to make sure that the data_min is always less than equal to data_max.
…pped. (apache#5136) Existing test cases cover this fix. In addition I have added an assert to make sure that the data_min is always less than equal to data_max.
…pped. (apache#5136) Existing test cases cover this fix. In addition I have added an assert to make sure that the data_min is always less than equal to data_max.
In the lines 1409-1413 of file python/tvm/relay/frontend/mxnet.py, are there typos when has_sum is False?
Should data_min_idx be -2 and data_max_idx be -1 according to lines 467-474 of https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/blob/master/src/operator/subgraph/mkldnn/mkldnn_conv.cc
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: