Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ci] Shard Hexagon tests #11132

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 27, 2022
Merged

[ci] Shard Hexagon tests #11132

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 27, 2022

Conversation

driazati
Copy link
Member

@driazati driazati commented Apr 26, 2022

This shards up the hexagon build since after #11016 it's the longest test step. This also drops the max runtime per stage down to 2 hours from 4 hours to make these kind of increases more obvious in the future

cc @areusch @mehrdadh

@driazati driazati changed the title [ci] Split hexagon into 2 steps [ci] Shard Hexagon tests Apr 26, 2022
@driazati driazati marked this pull request as ready for review April 26, 2022 21:55
@github-actions github-actions bot requested review from areusch and mehrdadh April 26, 2022 21:56
@driazati driazati force-pushed the hex branch 3 times, most recently from 1599755 to a74963e Compare April 26, 2022 22:10
Copy link
Member

@mehrdadh mehrdadh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@driazati thanks for fixing this. LGTM!
I'll wait for @areusch to take a look as well.

This shards up the hexagon build since after apache#11016 it's the longest test step. This also drops the max runtime per stage down to 2 hours from 4 hours to make these kind of increases more obvious in the future.
@areusch areusch merged commit 3afb433 into apache:main Apr 27, 2022
shtinsa pushed a commit to Deelvin/tvm that referenced this pull request May 17, 2022
This shards up the hexagon build since after apache#11016 it's the longest test step. This also drops the max runtime per stage down to 2 hours from 4 hours to make these kind of increases more obvious in the future.

Co-authored-by: driazati <driazati@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants