Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ci] Default to n=2 for test parallelism #12414

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 25, 2022
Merged

[ci] Default to n=2 for test parallelism #12414

merged 2 commits into from
Aug 25, 2022

Conversation

driazati
Copy link
Member

@driazati driazati commented Aug 12, 2022

This is attempt 2 of #12376 which was reverted in #12413. The changes
in plugin.py should keep all the tests on the same node so sporadic
failures don't happen due to scheduling.

cc @Mousius @areusch @gigiblender

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Built docs for commit ae149a7 can be found here.

@driazati
Copy link
Member Author

@tvm-bot rerun

@driazati driazati marked this pull request as ready for review August 23, 2022 19:54
@driazati
Copy link
Member Author

@tvm-bot rerun

This is attempt #2 of apache#12376 which was reverted in apache#12413. The changes
in `plugin.py` should keep all the tests on the same node so sporadic
failures don't happen due to scheduling.
Copy link
Contributor

@areusch areusch left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

awesome, this should help CI time a lot!

@areusch areusch merged commit 01fcdfc into apache:main Aug 25, 2022
xinetzone pushed a commit to daobook/tvm that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2022
* Revert "[skip ci] Revert "[ci] Default to n=2 for test parallelism (apache#12376)" (apache#12413)"

This reverts commit 478b672.

* [ci] Default to n=2 for test parallelism

This is attempt apache#2 of apache#12376 which was reverted in apache#12413. The changes
in `plugin.py` should keep all the tests on the same node so sporadic
failures don't happen due to scheduling.

Co-authored-by: driazati <driazati@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants