Skip to content

[Fix] Fix the wrong check for tuple node in #18163 #18169

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
cccxinli wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

[Fix] Fix the wrong check for tuple node in #18163 #18169

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
8 changes: 5 additions & 3 deletions src/relax/transform/fuse_ops.cc
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -427,9 +427,7 @@ class FunctionCreator : public ExprMutator {
}

for (const Expr& arg : call->args) {
if (GetStructInfoAs<TupleStructInfoNode>(arg) != nullptr) {
// The argument is fully referenced. Thus we remove it from the mapping.
partially_used_tuple_params_.erase(arg.get());
if (arg.as<TupleNode>()) {
const Tuple& tup_args = Downcast<Tuple>(arg);
for (const Expr& tup_arg : tup_args->fields) {
CheckDefAndUpdateParam(tup_arg);
Expand All @@ -438,6 +436,10 @@ class FunctionCreator : public ExprMutator {
} else {
CheckDefAndUpdateParam(arg);
}
if (GetStructInfoAs<TupleStructInfoNode>(arg) != nullptr) {
// The argument is fully referenced. Thus we remove it from the mapping.
partially_used_tuple_params_.erase(arg.get());
}
}
}
} else if (var_binding->value.as<TupleGetItemNode>()) {
Expand Down