-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[ARM][Performance] Improve ARM CPU depthwise convolution performance #2345
[ARM][Performance] Improve ARM CPU depthwise convolution performance #2345
Conversation
Hi @merrymercy, could you spend some time reviewing? Thanks. |
nnvm/src/top/nn/convolution.cc
Outdated
@@ -73,15 +73,17 @@ inline bool Conv2DInferShape(const nnvm::NodeAttrs& attrs, | |||
CHECK_EQ(param.channels % param.groups, 0U) | |||
<< "output channels must divide group size"; | |||
|
|||
TShape wshape({param.channels / param.groups, | |||
// Restore depthwise conv2d kernel layout |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the old code is strange and incorrect while your code is straightforward and correct. We can delete this comment.
# Currently, Mali schedule doesn't use it like conv2d. | ||
if cfg.is_fallback: | ||
ref_log = autotvm.tophub.load_reference_log('arm_cpu', 'rk3399', 'depthwise_conv2d_nchw', | ||
'direct') |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
'direct') | |
'contrib_spatial_pack') |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Overall looks good. But recently we updated the alter_op_layout to support relay (#2356, a new argument 'F' in introduced). Please resolve the conflict.
f26cdfd
to
4cfc239
Compare
4cfc239
to
1467f34
Compare
@merrymercy Have modified code as you suggest. Please review it again. |
6fccb6d
to
ff30450
Compare
ff30450
to
0e86fe0
Compare
…pache#2345) * Add sptialpack schedule for arm cpu depthwise convolution * Supply comments.
…pache#2345) * Add sptialpack schedule for arm cpu depthwise convolution * Supply comments.
original discussion about this PR:
#2028
To leverage existing spatial pack schedule and add tunable compute_at knob to re-implement ARM CPU's depthwise convolution. Currently, this PR named this schedule as
contrib_spatial_pack
as discussed in the original PR #2028.On my A53@2.0GHz ARM CPU (MTK6763), which can boost 1.6X performance compared with previous depthwise convolution in the Mobilenet V1 model (I have also checked the correctness of this schedule). However, @yzhliu has also proved that this PR can also boost the performance on x86 CPU.
The following is the Tensorflow Mobilenet V1 model auto tvm training GFLOPS log:
Currently:
[Task 2/20] Current/Best: 0.98/ 2.32 GFLOPS | Progress: (1427/2000) | 2679.82 s Done.
[Task 4/20] Current/Best: 0.56/ 1.15 GFLOPS | Progress: (1072/2000) | 2461.27 s Done.
[Task 6/20] Current/Best: 1.08/ 2.78 GFLOPS | Progress: (1084/2000) | 1987.91 s Done.
[Task 8/20] Current/Best: 0.39/ 1.19 GFLOPS | Progress: (1815/2000) | 2744.70 s Done.
[Task 10/20] Current/Best: 1.09/ 2.33 GFLOPS | Progress: (1222/2000) | 1866.02 s Done.
[Task 12/20] Current/Best: 0.42/ 0.90 GFLOPS | Progress: (1716/2000) | 2528.94 s Done.
[Task 14/20] Current/Best: 1.89/ 2.63 GFLOPS | Progress: (1284/2000) | 2288.55 s Done.
[Task 16/20] Current/Best: 0.47/ 0.96 GFLOPS | Progress: (1467/2000) | 2282.65 s Done.
[Task 18/20] Current/Best: 1.43/ 2.61 GFLOPS | Progress: (1007/2000) | 1525.76 s Done.
After this PR optimization:
[Task 2/20] Current/Best: 0.00/ 4.83 GFLOPS | Progress: (1682/2000) | 1470.40 s Done.
[Task 4/20] Current/Best: 1.35/ 3.17 GFLOPS | Progress: (1257/2000) | 1032.80 s Done.
[Task 6/20] Current/Best: 2.04/ 5.49 GFLOPS | Progress: (1904/2000) | 1623.10 s Done.
[Task 8/20] Current/Best: 0.75/ 3.15 GFLOPS | Progress: (1885/2000) | 1546.22 s Done.
[Task 10/20] Current/Best: 2.09/ 6.07 GFLOPS | Progress: (2000/2000) | 1640.41 s Done.
[Task 12/20] Current/Best: 2.99/ 3.80 GFLOPS | Progress: (1853/2000) | 1547.13 s Done.
[Task 14/20] Current/Best: 4.59/ 6.06 GFLOPS | Progress: (1355/2000) | 1091.93 s Done.
[Task 16/20] Current/Best: 1.96/ 4.01 GFLOPS | Progress: (2000/2000) | 1586.18 s Done.
[Task 18/20] Current/Best: 2.33/ 4.63 GFLOPS | Progress: (2000/2000) | 1599.89 s Done.
The depthwise convolution total execution time on single A53@2.0GHz time can be from 45.3839ms to 28.1945ms.
One thing you must notice to use this schedule: You MUST make the XGBTunner constructor’s feature type argument be feature_type= 'knob'. i.e. XGBTuner(tsk, loss_type='rank', feature_type='knob'). Otherwise your program maybe hang forever.
This schedule is not default schedule (i.e. direct) of arm cpu / x86 cpu depthwise convolution. I will update the auto tuning of ARM CPU tutorial to show how to use this
contrib_spatial_pack
schedule in the following PR.@merrymercy @yzhliu @tqchen pls review it.