-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Hybrid Script] Supporting scheduling hybrid script #2416
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
were
changed the title
[WIP] [Hybrid Script] Supporting scheduling hybrid script
[Hybrid Script] Supporting scheduling hybrid script
Jan 11, 2019
@kevinthesun @xqdan @tqchen Can you take a look? I believe it is ready to merge for a runnable version. |
xqdan
reviewed
Jan 12, 2019
xqdan
approved these changes
Jan 12, 2019
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
kevinthesun
approved these changes
Jan 12, 2019
cc @merrymercy please take a look and shepherd this PR |
merrymercy
reviewed
Jan 13, 2019
merrymercy
reviewed
Jan 13, 2019
merrymercy
reviewed
Jan 13, 2019
merrymercy
reviewed
Jan 13, 2019
merrymercy
added
status: need update
need update based on feedbacks
and removed
status: need review
labels
Jan 14, 2019
@merrymercy I think I fixed the submodule thing. I did not use the correct version of HalideIR. |
merrymercy
approved these changes
Jan 15, 2019
tqchen
added
status: accepted
and removed
status: need update
need update based on feedbacks
labels
Jan 15, 2019
Closed
wweic
pushed a commit
to neo-ai/tvm
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 20, 2019
* on the way to enable hybrid schedule * I think I am done with imperfect loop split? * copyright watermark * loop annotation * fix lint * fix lint 1 * shit! * loop reorder supported * support bind to add some tests * fused tested * imperfect loop testcase * fix lint * add bind testcase * fix doc * fix online edit typo * resolve @mercymercy review * fix indent * i should convince myself it is not flaky test first * fix test hybrid * how many flaky test are you expecting; i ball ball u to let me pass * rebase halide...
wweic
pushed a commit
to neo-ai/tvm
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 20, 2019
* on the way to enable hybrid schedule * I think I am done with imperfect loop split? * copyright watermark * loop annotation * fix lint * fix lint 1 * shit! * loop reorder supported * support bind to add some tests * fused tested * imperfect loop testcase * fix lint * add bind testcase * fix doc * fix online edit typo * resolve @mercymercy review * fix indent * i should convince myself it is not flaky test first * fix test hybrid * how many flaky test are you expecting; i ball ball u to let me pass * rebase halide...
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
splitloop annotationloop reordering(user should guarantee the correctness after reordering)loop fuse(user should guarantee the correctness after fusing)loop bind(i have implemented it; let me later add test cases)