Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ROCm changed name of library and removed the old one in ROCm 3.7 release. #6345

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 27, 2020
Merged

ROCm changed name of library and removed the old one in ROCm 3.7 release. #6345

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 27, 2020

Conversation

mvermeulen
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for contributing to TVM! Please refer to guideline https://tvm.apache.org/docs/contribute/ for useful information and tips. After the pull request is submitted, please request code reviews from Reviewers by @ them in the pull request thread.

Copy link
Contributor

@tmoreau89 tmoreau89 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@masahi
Copy link
Member

masahi commented Aug 26, 2020

Does this change make rocm 3.7 requirement for TVM? This is only for confirmation, I'm +1 for tracking the latest release.

cc @t-vi

@mvermeulen
Copy link
Contributor Author

The new library name was introduced in ROCm 3.5. The old library name was deleted in ROCm 3.7.

So this change makes ROCm 3.5 or later a requirement for mainline TVM, and fixes a break with ROCm 3.7 when the old name was deleted.

@t-vi
Copy link
Contributor

t-vi commented Aug 27, 2020

Seems good to me. If we are giving up on pre-3.3 compat, I should also remove the code object v3 workaround I introduced in the spring in favour of 3.5+. (I'll send a PR.)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants