Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Quantization] Support for more ops (conv1d) #6731

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 7, 2020
Merged

Conversation

tmoreau89
Copy link
Contributor

@tmoreau89 tmoreau89 commented Oct 21, 2020

Quantization support for conv1d for custom model. Added additional ops to increase size of quantized subgraphs.

@tmoreau89
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ZihengJiang I want to add more coverage for the quantizer, do we generally add unit tests when adding more ops or is this PR sufficient?

@ZihengJiang
Copy link
Contributor

@tmoreau89 It is ok if you have verified that this PR doesn't affect the accuracy of common quantized models

@tmoreau89
Copy link
Contributor Author

I did a spot check on a model that we're quantizing. Also ran some validation over a CIFAR-10 model from MxNet.

I'll change it to a PR for review.

@tmoreau89 tmoreau89 marked this pull request as ready for review October 21, 2020 21:59
@tmoreau89 tmoreau89 requested a review from vinx13 October 21, 2020 21:59
@tmoreau89
Copy link
Contributor Author

thanks @ZihengJiang @vinx13 PTAL!

@tmoreau89 tmoreau89 changed the title [Draft] Quantization support for more ops [Quantization] Support for more ops (conv1d) Oct 21, 2020
@vinx13 vinx13 merged commit ff9c480 into apache:main Nov 7, 2020
trevor-m pushed a commit to trevor-m/tvm that referenced this pull request Dec 2, 2020
trevor-m pushed a commit to trevor-m/tvm that referenced this pull request Dec 4, 2020
trevor-m pushed a commit to neo-ai/tvm that referenced this pull request Dec 4, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants