-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove LoweredModule #8886
Merged
leandron
merged 7 commits into
apache:main
from
electriclilies:remove-lowered-module-final-draft
Sep 3, 2021
Merged
Remove LoweredModule #8886
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
6ed813b
Remove LoweredModule
electriclilies 6317d8c
Clean up some comments
electriclilies 7da7cec
QEMU flaky tests
electriclilies d51edb4
Don't add external functions to the LoweredFunctions module
electriclilies 914275f
QEMU flaky test
electriclilies ca53534
Respond to feedback
electriclilies d4b2bd7
flaky test
electriclilies File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok in a follow up if you like, but I think folding type inf into LowerTEPass makes sense to account for the rewritten calls. Someday we'll figure out how to gracefully do that incrementally since it's really overkill for just xfering known types from old to new CallNodes!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I will add it as a TODO
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actually there's a slight problem with this -- you can't run InferType on the whole
lowered_mod
becauselowered_mod
has functions with GlobalVars that are in the IRModule's global_var_map, but you can't find them using Lookup because they are not the same object (it fails on line 210)..https://github.com/apache/tvm/blob/main/src/relay/transforms/type_infer.cc#L209:L215
My workaround was to only apply type inferencing to the
main_module
(since that was what was done before this PR).I'm not sure if this is a bug in how the type inferencer is dealing with GlobalVars (maybe it should be doing lookup by name hint, not pointer equality) or if it's a bug in how those GlobalVars are being made / propagated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Then the other problem is even if you do successfully manage to lookup the function, there are PrimFuncs in the module which the type inferencer doesn't know how to deal with. We could just skip PrimFuncs we find during type inference..
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
OK actually I think I fixed this in #8399