Skip to content

[IMPROVEMENT][COMMON] Fix common module code style#99

Merged
roryqi merged 2 commits intoapache:masterfrom
roryqi:common_style
Jul 29, 2022
Merged

[IMPROVEMENT][COMMON] Fix common module code style#99
roryqi merged 2 commits intoapache:masterfrom
roryqi:common_style

Conversation

@roryqi
Copy link
Contributor

@roryqi roryqi commented Jul 29, 2022

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

To solve common module code style in pr Tencent/Firestorm#155

Why are the changes needed?

Improve our test code style

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No

How was this patch tested?

I add the test code style check commits, common module passed.
https://github.com/jerqi/incubator-uniffle/runs/7572429851?check_suite_focus=true

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jul 29, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #99 (f6eaeef) into master (ccb39ed) will decrease coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master      #99      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     56.33%   56.31%   -0.02%     
+ Complexity     1176     1175       -1     
============================================
  Files           149      149              
  Lines          7992     7992              
  Branches        766      766              
============================================
- Hits           4502     4501       -1     
  Misses         3246     3246              
- Partials        244      245       +1     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
.../apache/uniffle/coordinator/ClientConfManager.java 91.54% <0.00%> (-1.41%) ⬇️

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us.

@roryqi roryqi changed the title [Improvement] Fix common module code style [IMPROVEMENT][COMMON] Fix common module code style Jul 29, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants