Skip to content

Conversation

@rerngvit
Copy link
Contributor

@rerngvit rerngvit commented Jun 8, 2016

What is this PR for?

This PR applies the new interpreter registration mechanism to FlinkInterpreter.

What type of PR is it?

Improvement

Todos

  • Move interpreter registration properties from static block to interpreter-setting.json

What is the Jira issue?

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-911

How should this be tested?

  1. apply patch
  2. rm -r interpreter/flink
  3. rm conf/interpreter.json
  4. mvn clean package -DskipTests -pl flink
  5. bin/zeppelin-daemon.sh start
  6. run some paragraph with simple Flink queries

Questions:

Does the licenses files need update? No
Is there breaking changes for older versions? No
Does this needs documentation? No

@rerngvit rerngvit closed this Jun 8, 2016
@rerngvit rerngvit reopened this Jun 8, 2016
@rerngvit rerngvit closed this Jun 8, 2016
@rerngvit rerngvit reopened this Jun 8, 2016
### What is this PR for?
This PR applies the new interpreter registration mechanism to FlinkInterpreter.

### What type of PR is it?
Improvement

### Todos
 - Move interpreter registration properties from static block to interpreter-setting.json

### What is the Jira issue?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-911

### How should this be tested?
1. apply patch
2. rm -r interpreter/flink
3. rm conf/interpreter.json
4. mvn clean package -DskipTests -pl flink
5. bin/zeppelin-daemon.sh start
6. run some paragraph with simple Flink queries

Questions:

Does the licenses files need update? No
Is there breaking changes for older versions? No
Does this needs documentation? No
@jongyoul
Copy link
Member

jongyoul commented Jun 9, 2016

I've tested it and worked well. LGTM. Merging if there's no more discussion. @rerngvit Could you please your jira id? I cannot assign you as a contributor

@bzz
Copy link
Member

bzz commented Jun 9, 2016

Looks great to me, @rerngvit thank you for contribution!
Have update JIRA issues assignment.

@asfgit asfgit closed this in 164bcd3 Jun 9, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants