Skip to content

Conversation

@oleksandravalko
Copy link

WHY

image

This point was marked as "solved", but I've looked into this comment anyway. I realised that the point is connected to apify-new-finished-actor-run-instant source/trigger, not apify-run-actor component. So now, we can set the trigger for all actors finished run, own or store ones.

OUTCOME

image image

I attempted to test this trigger within the ‘apify-integration-development’ workspace but it appears that the lack of available credits prevents users from testing this type of integration. Screenshots are made from my account, where I still have some credits.

Copy link
Member

@drobnikj drobnikj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just one nore otherwise good 👍 pre-approve

}) {
const listFn = actorSource === "store"
? this.listActors
: this.listUserActors;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not sure if @MisaFialova report it or not.
The listUserActors should call actors().list() without param my: true. We want to return all Actors including from Store if user pick recently used

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I see. Recent runs should include store actors as well. In this case, we missed it for the apify-run-actor component, where we should also list not only owned actors. I didn't question this part of the logic previously. I'll fix it for both components using the actorId input field.
image

Copy link

@protoss70 protoss70 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good :)

@oleksandravalko oleksandravalko merged commit 9a17254 into develop Dec 1, 2025
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants