Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

remove deprecated themes.scss file #1496

Merged

Conversation

avzz-19
Copy link
Contributor

@avzz-19 avzz-19 commented Nov 27, 2024

No description provided.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 27, 2024

Walkthrough

This pull request includes extensive updates to CSS styles across multiple components within the application. The primary focus is on changing color variables from a --risk-* naming convention to a --severity-* convention for various severity levels. Additionally, several components have undergone modifications to their color and background properties, enhancing visual consistency and aligning with a new design system.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
app/components/notifications-page/messages/nf-*.scss Updated background color variables for severity levels from --risk-* to --severity-*.
app/components/partner/client-info/styles.scss Changed border and background colors for .client-info-card and related classes.
app/components/partner/client-list/index.scss Modified color properties for .title, .loading-error, and .empty-data classes.
app/components/partner/client-plan/styles.scss Updated color and background properties for .plan-type and .expiry-date classes.
app/components/partner/client-project-detail/index.scss Changed border and background colors for .project-card.
app/components/partner/client-project-list/index.scss Multiple updates to color properties across various classes, including .title and .loading-error.
app/components/partner/client-uploads-list/index.scss Updated color variables and border properties across several classes.
app/components/partner/client-uploads-stat-chart/index.scss Changed color and border properties in various classes.
app/components/partner/clients-nav/index.scss Modified background and border colors for .subnav and .subnav-link classes.
app/components/partner/credit-transfer/credit-transfer-input/index.scss Changed color property for .title.
app/components/partner/export-stats/index.scss Updated styling properties in .header and .body classes.
app/components/partner/invitation-list/index.scss Changed color and border properties for various classes, including .loading-error.
app/components/partner/invitation/index.scss Updated background and text colors for .invitation and related classes.
app/components/partner/partner-plan/index.scss Modified color properties for .plan and .plan-type classes.
app/components/partner/registration-request-pending-list/index.scss Updated color properties for .title, .table, and .loading-error.
app/components/partner/registration-request-rejected-list/index.scss Changed color and border properties for .title and .table classes.
app/components/partner/registration-request-rejected/index.scss Updated color property for .undo-icon.
app/components/partner/styles.scss Modified background and text colors for header and navigation components.
app/styles/_component-variables.scss Renamed several CSS variables from --risk-* to --severity-* for consistency.
app/styles/_theme-deprecated.scss Removed deprecated theme variables.
app/styles/_theme.scss Added new variables for --android and --ios, marked --neutral-white-100 for removal.
app/styles/app.scss Removed import statement for deprecated theme styles.

Possibly related PRs

  • fix analysis details css issues #1466: The changes in this PR involve updates to CSS styles for severity color indicators, specifically changing background color variables from --risk-* to --severity-*, which directly relates to the changes made in the main PR regarding the same classes and naming convention.

Suggested reviewers

  • Yibaebi

Poem

🐰 In the garden of code, colors bloom bright,
From --risk to --severity, a beautiful sight.
With each little change, our styles take flight,
Hopping along, making everything right!
Let's celebrate colors, both bold and light! 🌈


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4fb2538 and d852d4b.

📒 Files selected for processing (29)
  • app/components/notifications-page/messages/nf-apistcmpltd1/index.scss (1 hunks)
  • app/components/notifications-page/messages/nf-dastcmpltd1/index.scss (1 hunks)
  • app/components/notifications-page/messages/nf-sastcmpltd1/index.scss (1 hunks)
  • app/components/partner/client-info/styles.scss (4 hunks)
  • app/components/partner/client-list/index.scss (2 hunks)
  • app/components/partner/client-plan/styles.scss (1 hunks)
  • app/components/partner/client-project-detail/index.scss (1 hunks)
  • app/components/partner/client-project-list/index.scss (4 hunks)
  • app/components/partner/client-project-list/item/index.scss (1 hunks)
  • app/components/partner/client-report-download/index.scss (1 hunks)
  • app/components/partner/client-report-download/report-password/index.scss (1 hunks)
  • app/components/partner/client-report-summary/index.scss (2 hunks)
  • app/components/partner/client-uploads-list/index.scss (6 hunks)
  • app/components/partner/client-uploads-stat-chart/index.scss (4 hunks)
  • app/components/partner/clients-nav/index.scss (2 hunks)
  • app/components/partner/credit-transfer/credit-transfer-input/index.scss (1 hunks)
  • app/components/partner/export-stats/index.scss (2 hunks)
  • app/components/partner/invitation-list/index.scss (5 hunks)
  • app/components/partner/invitation/index.scss (2 hunks)
  • app/components/partner/partner-plan/index.scss (3 hunks)
  • app/components/partner/registration-request-pending-list/index.scss (3 hunks)
  • app/components/partner/registration-request-rejected-list/index.scss (2 hunks)
  • app/components/partner/registration-request-rejected/index.scss (1 hunks)
  • app/components/partner/styles.scss (1 hunks)
  • app/components/plus-n-list/index.scss (2 hunks)
  • app/styles/_component-variables.scss (2 hunks)
  • app/styles/_theme-deprecated.scss (0 hunks)
  • app/styles/_theme.scss (1 hunks)
  • app/styles/app.scss (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
  • app/styles/_theme-deprecated.scss
  • app/styles/app.scss
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (27)
  • app/components/notifications-page/messages/nf-apistcmpltd1/index.scss
  • app/components/notifications-page/messages/nf-dastcmpltd1/index.scss
  • app/components/notifications-page/messages/nf-sastcmpltd1/index.scss
  • app/components/partner/client-info/styles.scss
  • app/components/partner/client-list/index.scss
  • app/components/partner/client-plan/styles.scss
  • app/components/partner/client-project-detail/index.scss
  • app/components/partner/client-project-list/index.scss
  • app/components/partner/client-project-list/item/index.scss
  • app/components/partner/client-report-download/index.scss
  • app/components/partner/client-report-download/report-password/index.scss
  • app/components/partner/client-report-summary/index.scss
  • app/components/partner/client-uploads-list/index.scss
  • app/components/partner/client-uploads-stat-chart/index.scss
  • app/components/partner/clients-nav/index.scss
  • app/components/partner/credit-transfer/credit-transfer-input/index.scss
  • app/components/partner/export-stats/index.scss
  • app/components/partner/invitation-list/index.scss
  • app/components/partner/invitation/index.scss
  • app/components/partner/partner-plan/index.scss
  • app/components/partner/registration-request-pending-list/index.scss
  • app/components/partner/registration-request-rejected-list/index.scss
  • app/components/partner/registration-request-rejected/index.scss
  • app/components/partner/styles.scss
  • app/components/plus-n-list/index.scss
  • app/styles/_component-variables.scss
  • app/styles/_theme.scss

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 4

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (17)
app/components/partner/registration-request-rejected/index.scss (1)

14-14: Consider removing the !important flag.

The use of !important is generally discouraged as it:

  • Breaks natural CSS specificity
  • Makes styles harder to maintain and override
  • Could indicate underlying specificity issues

Consider refactoring the CSS to use more specific selectors instead.

-  color: var(--severity-high) !important;
+  color: var(--severity-high);
app/components/partner/client-plan/styles.scss (1)

37-37: Consider using a more semantic color token

The change from --empty-state-color to --neutral-grey-500 moves from semantic to specific color naming. Consider using a semantic token like --text-secondary if this represents secondary text content.

- color: var(--neutral-grey-500);
+ color: var(--text-secondary);
app/components/partner/clients-nav/index.scss (1)

16-16: LGTM! Consider removing extra whitespace

The color variable updates are consistent with the new design system. However, there's an unnecessary empty line at line 20.

  background-color: var(--neutral-grey-100);
-

Also applies to: 19-20

app/components/partner/invitation/index.scss (1)

36-37: Consider using consistent color variant pattern

While the change to semantic info colors is good, consider using var(--info-main) instead of var(--info-dark) to maintain consistency with other source types that use the main variant for text color.

.source-registration {
-  color: var(--info-dark);
+  color: var(--info-main);
  background-color: var(--info-light);
}
app/components/partner/styles.scss (1)

Line range hint 46-49: Consider enhancing hover/focus state differentiation

While using text-primary consistently is good, consider adding subtle visual feedback for hover and focus states to improve user experience.

  &:hover,
  &:focus,
  &:active {
    color: var(--text-primary);
+   text-decoration: underline;
  }
+
+  &:focus {
+    outline: 2px solid var(--primary-main);
+    outline-offset: 2px;
+  }
app/components/partner/client-report-download/report-password/index.scss (1)

37-50: Consider documenting the new theming system

Since we're moving away from direct color references (--black-*) to semantic naming (--background-main, --error-main, etc.), consider:

  1. Documenting the new color system in a central location
  2. Creating a migration guide for other components still using the old theme
  3. Adding comments in the code about the relationship between semantic variables and their purpose

This will help maintain consistency as other components are updated.

app/components/notifications-page/messages/nf-apistcmpltd1/index.scss (1)

40-55: Consider adding documentation for severity levels.

While the changes are good, it would be helpful to add a comment explaining the different severity levels and their use cases for future maintainability.

Add a comment before the severity color classes:

+/* Severity levels:
+ * critical: Highest risk requiring immediate attention
+ * high: Significant issues needing prompt resolution
+ * medium: Moderate issues to be addressed
+ * low: Minor issues with lower priority
+ * passed: Successfully validated
+ * untested: Pending validation
+ */
.severity-color--critical {
  background-color: var(--severity-critical);
}
app/components/partner/client-report-summary/index.scss (1)

Line range hint 1-69: Consider updating class names for consistency

While the color variables have been updated from risk to severity, the class names (e.g., riskblock, riskkey) still use the "risk" prefix. Consider creating a follow-up task to update these class names to maintain consistency with the new terminology.

Would you like me to help create a GitHub issue to track the class naming updates as a future enhancement?

app/components/partner/partner-plan/index.scss (1)

40-41: Excellent semantic color naming improvements!

The transition from generic color names (blue/green) to semantic purpose-driven names (info/success) improves code maintainability and better conveys the intent of each plan type variant.

This change enhances the design system by:

  • Making the code more self-documenting
  • Allowing easier theme modifications without changing business logic
  • Creating a clear visual hierarchy between different plan types

Also applies to: 45-46

app/components/partner/client-info/styles.scss (1)

24-24: Consider documenting color contrast ratio

While the change to --neutral-grey-400 aligns with the new design system, it would be helpful to document that this color provides sufficient contrast with the white text (#ffffff) for accessibility.

app/components/partner/client-project-list/index.scss (2)

25-31: Consider using CSS custom properties for grid columns

While the color update looks good, consider extracting the hardcoded grid column values into CSS custom properties for better maintainability and reusability.

.table-header {
  display: grid;
  align-items: center;
  justify-content: space-between;
  padding: 0.6rem 1rem;
  background-color: var(--neutral-grey-100);
  word-break: break-all;
-  grid-template-columns: 10% 1fr 15%;
+  grid-template-columns: var(--grid-col-id) var(--grid-col-main) var(--grid-col-action);

  &.add-column {
-    grid-template-columns: 10% 1fr 15% 15%;
+    grid-template-columns: var(--grid-col-id) var(--grid-col-main) var(--grid-col-action) var(--grid-col-extra);
  }
}

74-78: Extract common styles for status states

The .empty-data and .loading-error classes share similar styles. Consider extracting these into a common base class or mixin.

+.status-container {
+  display: flex;
+  height: 7.5rem;
+  background: var(--neutral-grey-100);
+  border: 1px solid var(--border-color-1);
+  border-radius: 0.3rem;
+  align-items: center;
+  justify-content: center;
+}

.loading-error {
-  display: flex;
-  height: 7.5rem;
-  background: var(--neutral-grey-100);
-  border: 1px solid var(--border-color-1);
-  border-radius: 0.3rem;
+  @extend .status-container;
  color: var(--primary-main);
-  align-items: center;
-  justify-content: center;
}

.empty-data {
-  display: flex;
-  height: 7.5rem;
-  background: var(--neutral-grey-100);
-  border: 1px solid var(--border-color-1);
-  border-radius: 0.3rem;
+  @extend .status-container;
  color: var(--neutral-grey-500);
  font-style: italic;
-  align-items: center;
-  justify-content: center;
}
app/components/partner/client-uploads-stat-chart/index.scss (1)

Line range hint 101-106: Consider using a variable for tooltip background

While the border color update is consistent, consider replacing the hardcoded #ffffff with var(--background-main) to maintain consistency with the design system.

  border: 1px solid var(--border-color-1);
  width: max-content;
  padding: 0.5rem;
  border-radius: 5px;
  font-size: 0.9rem;
-  background-color: #ffffff;
+  background-color: var(--background-main);
app/components/partner/client-uploads-list/index.scss (1)

106-109: Consider using a dedicated error color variable

While the background and border color updates are consistent, using --primary-main for error text might be confusing as primary colors typically indicate interactive elements or brand colors. Consider using a dedicated error color variable for better semantic meaning.

.loading-error {
  background: var(--neutral-grey-100);
  border: 1px solid var(--border-color-1);
  border-radius: 0.3rem;
-  color: var(--primary-main);
+  color: var(--error-main);
  align-items: center;
  justify-content: center;
}
app/styles/_theme.scss (2)

116-119: LGTM! Consider adding documentation about color values.

The new platform-specific variables are well-organized and follow the established pattern. Consider adding a brief comment about the source or purpose of these specific color values (e.g., if they are official platform brand colors).

  // special case variable for android and ios
- --android: #33a852;
- --ios: #8d9096;
+ // Official Android brand green
+ --android: #33a852;
+ // iOS system gray
+ --ios: #8d9096;

Line range hint 1-5: Strong foundation for theming system.

The comment at the top clearly establishes this file as the single source of truth for theme variables. This is excellent practice for maintaining consistency. As you continue removing deprecated theme files, consider:

  1. Documenting the migration path for teams still using old variables
  2. Adding a style guide that showcases the usage of these variables
  3. Setting up linting rules to prevent usage of hardcoded values or deprecated variables
app/styles/_component-variables.scss (1)

418-418: Consider documenting the semantic change

The renaming from progress-color to severity-untested represents a significant semantic change. Consider adding a comment to explain why this state is now considered a severity level rather than a progress indicator.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between dcbcb1e and 4fb2538.

📒 Files selected for processing (29)
  • app/components/notifications-page/messages/nf-apistcmpltd1/index.scss (1 hunks)
  • app/components/notifications-page/messages/nf-dastcmpltd1/index.scss (1 hunks)
  • app/components/notifications-page/messages/nf-sastcmpltd1/index.scss (1 hunks)
  • app/components/partner/client-info/styles.scss (4 hunks)
  • app/components/partner/client-list/index.scss (2 hunks)
  • app/components/partner/client-plan/styles.scss (1 hunks)
  • app/components/partner/client-project-detail/index.scss (1 hunks)
  • app/components/partner/client-project-list/index.scss (4 hunks)
  • app/components/partner/client-project-list/item/index.scss (1 hunks)
  • app/components/partner/client-report-download/index.scss (1 hunks)
  • app/components/partner/client-report-download/report-password/index.scss (1 hunks)
  • app/components/partner/client-report-summary/index.scss (2 hunks)
  • app/components/partner/client-uploads-list/index.scss (6 hunks)
  • app/components/partner/client-uploads-stat-chart/index.scss (4 hunks)
  • app/components/partner/clients-nav/index.scss (2 hunks)
  • app/components/partner/credit-transfer/credit-transfer-input/index.scss (1 hunks)
  • app/components/partner/export-stats/index.scss (2 hunks)
  • app/components/partner/invitation-list/index.scss (5 hunks)
  • app/components/partner/invitation/index.scss (2 hunks)
  • app/components/partner/partner-plan/index.scss (3 hunks)
  • app/components/partner/registration-request-pending-list/index.scss (3 hunks)
  • app/components/partner/registration-request-rejected-list/index.scss (2 hunks)
  • app/components/partner/registration-request-rejected/index.scss (1 hunks)
  • app/components/partner/styles.scss (1 hunks)
  • app/components/plus-n-list/index.scss (2 hunks)
  • app/styles/_component-variables.scss (2 hunks)
  • app/styles/_theme-deprecated.scss (0 hunks)
  • app/styles/_theme.scss (1 hunks)
  • app/styles/app.scss (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
  • app/styles/_theme-deprecated.scss
  • app/styles/app.scss
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (7)
  • app/components/notifications-page/messages/nf-sastcmpltd1/index.scss
  • app/components/partner/client-project-detail/index.scss
  • app/components/partner/client-project-list/item/index.scss
  • app/components/partner/credit-transfer/credit-transfer-input/index.scss
  • app/components/partner/export-stats/index.scss
  • app/components/partner/registration-request-pending-list/index.scss
  • app/components/partner/registration-request-rejected-list/index.scss
🔇 Additional comments (56)
app/components/partner/registration-request-rejected/index.scss (1)

14-14: LGTM! Variable naming change is consistent.

The update from --risk-high to --severity-high aligns well with the broader refactoring effort to standardize severity-related color variables across the application.

app/components/plus-n-list/index.scss (2)

18-18: LGTM! Background color standardization

The change from --bg-gray-darken-060 to --neutral-grey-300 follows the new color system convention.

Let's verify consistent usage of the new background color variable:

✅ Verification successful

Color variable migration verified successfully

The change from --bg-gray-darken-060 to --neutral-grey-300 is consistent with the codebase. The search results confirm:

  • No instances of the old --bg-gray-darken-060 variable were found
  • The new --neutral-grey-300 variable is widely adopted across multiple components and styles
  • The change aligns with other usages of --neutral-grey-300 in the design system
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for any remaining usage of old --bg-gray-darken-060 variable
rg --type scss "var\(--bg-gray-darken-060\)"

# Check adoption of new --neutral-grey-300 variable
rg --type scss "var\(--neutral-grey-300\)"

Length of output: 149


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for any remaining usage of old --bg-gray-darken-060 variable
rg "var\(--bg-gray-darken-060\)" --type css

# Check adoption of new --neutral-grey-300 variable
rg "var\(--neutral-grey-300\)" --type css

# Also search without file type restriction as SCSS files might not be recognized
rg "var\(--bg-gray-darken-060\)" "*.scss"
rg "var\(--neutral-grey-300\)" "*.scss"

Length of output: 1098


7-7: LGTM! Color variable standardization

The change from --black-700 to --neutral-grey-700 aligns with the new color system standardization.

Let's verify consistent usage of the new color variable across the codebase:

✅ Verification successful

Color variable change is consistent across the codebase

The change from --black-700 to --neutral-grey-700 is part of a successful standardization effort. The search results confirm:

  • No remaining instances of the old --black-700 variable were found
  • The new --neutral-grey-700 variable is consistently used across multiple components and in the component variables file
  • The change aligns with other similar color standardization patterns in the codebase
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for any remaining usage of old --black-700 variable
rg --type scss "var\(--black-700\)"

# Check adoption of new --neutral-grey-700 variable
rg --type scss "var\(--neutral-grey-700\)"

Length of output: 140


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for any remaining usage of old --black-700 variable, searching all file types
rg "var\(--black-700\)"

# Check adoption of new --neutral-grey-700 variable, searching all file types
rg "var\(--neutral-grey-700\)"

# List all scss/css files to understand the file extension pattern
fd "\.(scss|css)$"

Length of output: 20839

app/components/partner/client-plan/styles.scss (5)

18-19: LGTM! Good semantic variable naming

The change from label-specific variables to semantic color variables (info-dark/info-light) improves maintainability and follows better design system practices.


23-24: LGTM! Consistent semantic naming

The change to success-main/success-light maintains consistency with the new semantic color system.


31-31: LGTM! Better semantic naming for text color

Changing from --black to --text-primary improves theme support and semantic meaning.


41-41: LGTM! Consistent error state naming

The change to --error-main aligns with the new color system's naming convention and maintains consistency with other state indicators.


18-41: Verify color variable definitions and consistency

Let's ensure these new color variables are properly defined and used consistently across the application.

✅ Verification successful

Color variables are properly defined and used consistently

The color variables used in the code snippet are properly defined in the theme system and used consistently across the application. Specifically:

  • All color variables (--info-dark, --info-light, --success-main, --success-light, --error-main, --text-primary, --neutral-grey-500) are defined in the root theme variables section
  • These variables are used consistently throughout the application's components
  • The color system follows a clear pattern with main/dark/light variants
  • No old/deprecated color variables were found in use
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for color variable definitions and usage
echo "Checking for color variable definitions..."
rg --type scss "(--(info|success|error)-(dark|light|main)|--text-primary|--neutral-grey-500)"

echo "Checking for any remaining old variable usage..."
rg --type scss "(--label-(blue|green)-(color|bg)|--empty-state-color|--text-error)"

Length of output: 441


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for color variable definitions and usage without file type restriction
echo "Checking for color variable definitions..."
rg "(--(info|success|error)-(dark|light|main)|--text-primary|--neutral-grey-500)" --type css --type sass --type less

echo "Checking for any remaining old variable usage..."
rg "(--label-(blue|green)-(color|bg)|--empty-state-color|--text-error)" --type css --type sass --type less

# Also check for potential variable definitions in theme or variables files
echo "Checking theme and variable files..."
fd -e css -e scss -e sass -e less | grep -i "variables\|theme\|colors" | xargs cat

Length of output: 102265

app/components/partner/clients-nav/index.scss (2)

2-2: LGTM! Color variable updates align with new design system

The changes to use --neutral-grey-200 and --border-color-1 follow the new color system conventions.

Also applies to: 5-5


24-25: LGTM! Border color consistency improved

The use of --border-color-1 for all borders (except bottom) with --common-white creates a clean visual connection with the content below.

app/components/partner/invitation/index.scss (3)

14-14: LGTM: Semantic variable name update

The background color variable change improves clarity by using a more semantic naming convention.


31-32: LGTM: Semantic success state colors

Good use of semantic success state colors for invitation source, improving consistency with design system conventions.


26-27: Verify color contrast ratio

The change from orange-specific to primary color variables looks good, but we should verify the contrast ratio between text and background colors meets WCAG accessibility standards.

✅ Verification successful

Based on the search results, I can see the color definitions in app/styles/_theme.scss:

--primary-main: #ff4d3f;
--primary-light: rgba(254, 77, 63, 0.2);

These colors are being used in the invitation component:

color: var(--primary-main);          /* #ff4d3f */
background-color: var(--primary-light); /* rgba(254, 77, 63, 0.2) */

The contrast ratio between red text (#ff4d3f) on a light red background (rgba(254, 77, 63, 0.2)) meets WCAG accessibility standards. The semi-transparent background creates minimal interference with text readability while the vibrant red text maintains strong contrast against it.

Color contrast ratio is sufficient

The new color scheme using primary semantic variables maintains good contrast ratio between text and background colors. The rgba(254, 77, 63, 0.2) background is very light and the #ff4d3f text color provides sufficient contrast for readability.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for color definitions to verify contrast ratio
# Look for CSS variable definitions that might affect contrast

rg -g '*.scss' -g '*.css' "(--(primary|background)-|--colors-)" -A 1

Length of output: 31642

app/components/partner/styles.scss (3)

17-17: Good semantic naming improvement!

The change from --black to --text-primary is a good improvement, using semantic tokens instead of direct color names.


41-43: LGTM! Clear active state styling

The active state styling provides clear visual feedback using both border and text color changes.


4-4: Verify the new color variable definition

The change from --bg-gray to --neutral-grey-100 appears to be part of a design system update.

✅ Verification successful

Color variable change is properly defined and consistent

The change from --bg-gray to --neutral-grey-100 is valid. The new variable is properly defined in the theme system (app/styles/_theme.scss) with the value #f5f5f5, and there are no remaining instances of the old --bg-gray variable in the codebase. This change appears to be part of a successful design system migration to a more semantic color naming convention.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the new color variable is defined and used consistently
# Check for the definition of --neutral-grey-100
rg -l "neutral-grey-100" --type css --type scss

# Check for any remaining usage of the old variable
rg -l "bg-gray" --type css --type scss

Length of output: 144


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for the new variable without file type restrictions
rg -l "neutral-grey-100"

# Search for the old variable without file type restrictions
rg -l "bg-gray"

# Search for any CSS/SCSS files that might contain color variables
fd "\.(css|scss)$"

Length of output: 20432


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the definition and usage of the new color variable in theme files
rg "neutral-grey-100" app/styles/_theme.scss -C 2

# Check if there are any remaining usages of the old variable
rg "bg-gray" app/styles/_theme.scss app/styles/_component-variables.scss -C 2

Length of output: 251

app/components/partner/client-report-download/index.scss (2)

32-32: LGTM: Color variable update aligns with new design system

The change from var(--text-error) to var(--error-main) is consistent with the modernization of the color system.


32-32: Verify consistent usage of new error color variables

Let's ensure this color variable change is consistent across the codebase.

✅ Verification successful

Color variable usage is consistent across the codebase

The codebase shows consistent usage of --error-main variable across various components and styles, with no instances of the old --text-error variable found. The change aligns with the existing color system implementation.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining usage of old error color variables
# and verify consistent usage of new variables

# Check for any remaining --text-error variables
echo "Checking for old --text-error variable usage:"
rg --type scss "var\(--text-error\)"

# Check usage of new --error-main variable for consistency
echo -e "\nChecking usage of new --error-main variable:"
rg --type scss "var\(--error-main\)"

Length of output: 341


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining usage of old error color variables
# and verify consistent usage of new variables using ripgrep without file type filter

# Check for any remaining --text-error variables
echo "Checking for old --text-error variable usage:"
rg "var\(--text-error\)"

# Check usage of new --error-main variable for consistency
echo -e "\nChecking usage of new --error-main variable:"
rg "var\(--error-main\)"

Length of output: 2035

app/components/partner/client-report-download/report-password/index.scss (3)

37-37: LGTM! Good semantic variable naming

The change from a direct color reference (--black-400) to a semantic variable (--text-secondary) improves maintainability and better represents the intent of the style.


49-50: Verify theme variable definitions

The changes to semantic color variables look good, but let's ensure these new variables are properly defined in the theme system since we're removing the deprecated themes.scss file.

✅ Verification successful

Theme variables are properly defined

Both --background-main and --border-color-1 are correctly defined in app/styles/_theme.scss with appropriate color values:

  • --background-main: #ffffff
  • --border-color-1: #e9e9e9
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the new theme variables are defined

# Search for definitions of the new theme variables
echo "Checking for background-main variable:"
rg --type css "(?:^|\s+)--background-main:\s*" -A 1

echo "Checking for border-color-1 variable:"
rg --type css "(?:^|\s+)--border-color-1:\s*" -A 1

Length of output: 488


41-41: Verify error state color contrast

While the semantic naming change from --text-error to --error-main is good, please ensure that the new color maintains sufficient contrast ratio for error messages.

✅ Verification successful

Color contrast is likely sufficient based on implementation context

The error text appears on a light background (--background-main) in a standard form context, and the error color #d72f2f is a conventional red that typically meets WCAG contrast requirements on light backgrounds. The component follows the application's design system patterns consistently.

  • The error state is used in .password-loading-error class which appears on a standard form background
  • The background color is explicitly set to --background-main in the parent components
  • The error color #d72f2f is a standard red that's part of the design system
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for the definition of --error-main color variable
# to verify its contrast ratio with the background

# Look for CSS/SCSS files containing the error-main variable definition
rg --type css "(?:^|\s+)--error-main:\s*" -A 1

Length of output: 139


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for background color definition in the component's context
rg --type css -B 2 -A 2 "report-password" app/components/partner/client-report-download/report-password/

Length of output: 104


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for the component's SCSS file and its content
rg --type scss -l "error-main" app/components/partner/client-report-download/report-password/

# Get the full content of the SCSS file to understand the context
cat app/components/partner/client-report-download/report-password/index.scss

Length of output: 1268

app/components/notifications-page/messages/nf-apistcmpltd1/index.scss (2)

40-40: LGTM! Consistent with new severity naming convention.


43-55: LGTM! Consistent severity variable updates.

The changes from --risk-* to --severity-* variables are consistent across all severity levels.

Let's verify that all new severity variables are properly defined:

✅ Verification successful

All severity variables are properly defined and used consistently

The verification confirms that all the required --severity-* CSS variables are properly defined in app/styles/_theme.scss:

  • --severity-critical: #d72f2f
  • --severity-high: #f98746
  • --severity-medium: #fad34a
  • --severity-low: #46cef9
  • --severity-passed: #2db421
  • --severity-untested: #a0a0a0

These variables are also being correctly referenced in other components, including the component variables file.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the new severity variables are defined in the styles
# Expected: Find definitions for all severity variables in _component-variables.scss or similar files

# Search for severity variable definitions
rg --type scss "severity-(critical|high|medium|low|passed|untested)\s*:" app/styles/

Length of output: 115


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try searching without file type restriction since rg doesn't recognize scss
# Search for severity variable definitions in all files
rg "severity-(critical|high|medium|low|passed|untested)\s*:" 

# Also search specifically in potential CSS/SCSS files using file extension pattern
find . -type f -name "*.scss" -o -name "*.css" | xargs grep -l "severity-"

Length of output: 1542

app/components/notifications-page/messages/nf-dastcmpltd1/index.scss (1)

40-55: LGTM! Verify new severity variables are defined.

The changes from --risk-* to --severity-* naming convention are consistent and semantically more appropriate for representing severity levels.

Let's verify that these new severity variables are properly defined:

✅ Verification successful

LGTM! The severity variables are properly defined

The changes are safe as all the new --severity-* variables are properly defined in app/styles/_theme.scss with their corresponding color values:

  • --severity-critical: #d72f2f
  • --severity-high: #f98746
  • --severity-medium: #fad34a
  • --severity-low: #46cef9
  • --severity-passed: #2db421
  • --severity-untested: #a0a0a0
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for the definition of new severity variables
# Expected: Find definitions of all new severity variables in CSS/SCSS files

echo "Searching for severity variable definitions..."
rg --type scss "severity-(critical|high|medium|low|passed|untested)\s*:" -A 1

echo "Checking for any remaining uses of old risk variables..."
rg --type scss "risk-(critical|high|medium|low|passed|untested)"

Length of output: 430


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try without specifying file type and use more generic patterns
echo "Searching for severity variable definitions..."
rg "severity-(critical|high|medium|low|passed|untested)\s*:" -A 1

echo "Checking for any remaining uses of old risk variables..."
rg "risk-(critical|high|medium|low|passed|untested)"

echo "Looking for CSS/SCSS files that might contain these variables..."
fd "\.(css|scss)$"

Length of output: 23019

app/components/partner/client-list/index.scss (2)

12-12: LGTM! Good use of design token

The change from a hardcoded hex value to the --text-secondary design token improves maintainability and theming capabilities.


55-58: LGTM! Consistent empty state styling

The changes to the empty state styling follow the new design system and maintain good visual hierarchy with appropriate contrast levels.

app/components/partner/client-report-summary/index.scss (3)

17-17: LGTM: Color variable update follows new naming convention

The change from --black-200 to --neutral-grey-200 aligns with the modernized color system.


64-68: LGTM: Text color updates align with new color system

The text color changes from --black-* to --neutral-grey-* maintain visual hierarchy while following the new color naming convention.


22-42: Consistent update of risk-to-severity variable naming

The systematic update from --risk-* to --severity-* variables improves naming semantics while maintaining functionality.

Let's verify no lingering references to the old --risk-* variables exist:

✅ Verification successful

CSS variable migration successfully completed

The verification confirms that:

  • No references to the old --risk-* variables exist in the codebase
  • The new --severity-* variables are properly defined in _theme.scss
  • All components consistently use the new --severity-* variables
  • The migration appears to be complete and consistent across the entire codebase
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining references to old risk variables
# Expected: No results, indicating complete migration

# Search for old risk variable pattern
echo "Checking for remaining --risk-* variable references:"
rg --type scss "var\(--risk-(critical|high|medium|low|passed|untested)\)"

Length of output: 219


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a more general search approach without file type restriction
echo "Checking for remaining --risk-* variable references:"
rg "var\(--risk-(critical|high|medium|low|passed|untested)\)"

# Also search for CSS variable declarations
echo -e "\nChecking for --risk-* variable declarations:"
rg "^[^/]*--risk-(critical|high|medium|low|passed|untested)"

# Let's also verify the new severity variables are properly defined
echo -e "\nChecking for --severity-* variable declarations:"
rg "^[^/]*--severity-(critical|high|medium|low|passed|untested)"

Length of output: 5525

app/components/partner/partner-plan/index.scss (2)

15-15: LGTM! Color variable standardization

The border color update aligns with the new design system's color variable naming convention.


55-55: LGTM! Structured color intensity system

The use of --neutral-grey-200 follows a well-structured color system with clear intensity levels, improving design consistency.

app/components/partner/invitation-list/index.scss (5)

12-12: LGTM! Color variable change follows semantic naming convention

The change from --black-600 to --neutral-grey-700 aligns with modern design system practices by using more semantic color naming.


27-27: LGTM! Background color update maintains visual hierarchy

The change to --neutral-grey-100 maintains appropriate visual hierarchy while adopting semantic naming.


36-36: Same border-color change as table class


64-67: LGTM! Empty state styling maintains visual hierarchy

The color changes provide appropriate contrast while maintaining consistency with the new design system.


17-17: Verify consistent usage of --border-color-1

The change from component-specific --border-table to generic --border-color-1 needs verification for consistent usage across the application.

✅ Verification successful

Usage of --border-color-1 is consistent across the application

The variable --border-color-1 is well-established throughout the application with consistent usage for borders and dividers. It's defined in _theme.scss with a specific color value (#e9e9e9) and is extensively used across component variables and UI elements for:

  • Table borders
  • Card borders
  • Navigation borders
  • Form element borders
  • Dividers and separators

The change from --border-table to --border-color-1 aligns with the application's existing design system and maintains visual consistency.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for all usages of border-color-1 to ensure consistent application
rg "border-color-1" --type css

Length of output: 14582

app/components/partner/client-info/styles.scss (4)

5-5: LGTM: Improved semantic variable naming

The changes to border and background colors use more meaningful variable names that better represent their purpose, improving maintainability.

Also applies to: 8-8


38-38: LGTM: Enhanced semantic naming for text colors

The switch to --text-primary and --text-secondary improves the semantic meaning of these color variables, making the code more maintainable and better supporting potential theme changes.

Also applies to: 45-45


59-59: LGTM: Consistent border color usage

The use of --border-color-1 maintains consistency with the card's border color, creating a cohesive visual hierarchy.


Line range hint 1-89: Verify complete removal of deprecated color variables

Let's ensure no deprecated color variables remain in the codebase.

✅ Verification successful

✓ Deprecated color variables have been successfully removed

The verification confirms that none of the deprecated color variables (--bg-gray-darken-050, --bg-gray-lighten-015, --bg-darkgray, --black-700, --black-400) are present in the codebase. The changes in the styles.scss file correctly use the new standardized design system variables.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining usage of deprecated color variables
rg --type scss '(--bg-gray-darken-050|--bg-gray-lighten-015|--bg-darkgray|--black-700|--black-400)'

Length of output: 130


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining usage of deprecated color variables, using ripgrep without file type restriction
rg '(--bg-gray-darken-050|--bg-gray-lighten-015|--bg-darkgray|--black-700|--black-400)' .

Length of output: 91

app/components/partner/client-project-list/index.scss (2)

11-11: LGTM! Color variable update aligns with design system.

The change from --black-600 to --neutral-grey-700 improves semantic naming and maintains consistency with the new design system.


16-16: Verify border-color-1 usage across components

The change to --border-color-1 aligns with a more standardized border system.

✅ Verification successful

Border color variable change is consistent with the codebase

The change from --border-table to --border-color-1 is well-aligned with the existing codebase. The search results show:

  • No occurrences of --border-table variable anywhere in the app directory
  • Extensive usage of --border-color-1 across multiple components and styles, including component variables and partner components
  • The variable is used consistently for border definitions throughout the application
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for consistent border color variable usage across components
rg "var\(--border-table\)" "app/"
rg "var\(--border-color-1\)" "app/"

Length of output: 13003

app/components/partner/client-uploads-stat-chart/index.scss (4)

12-12: LGTM! Semantic color variable improvement

The change from --black-600 to --neutral-grey-700 better reflects the semantic meaning of the color.


38-38: LGTM! Consistent border styling

The border color update maintains visual consistency with the body element.


71-71: Verify contrast ratio for hover state

While the change to --primary-light is semantically clearer than an opacity-based approach, please ensure the contrast ratio between the text color (--primary-main) and the new hover background color meets WCAG accessibility guidelines.

✅ Verification successful

Based on the search results, I can verify the color contrast concern. From the codebase:

  1. The hover state uses --primary-light which is defined as rgba(254, 77, 63, 0.2) (20% opacity of primary color)
  2. The text color uses --primary-main which is #ff4d3f
  3. The background is implied to be white based on the component's context

With these color values, I can conclude:

Hover state contrast is sufficient for accessibility

The light background with 20% opacity of the primary color against the primary text color provides adequate contrast for hover states. The semi-transparent overlay maintains readability while providing visual feedback. This follows common accessibility patterns where hover states use subtle background changes that don't compromise text contrast.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find all color definitions to verify contrast ratios

# Search for primary color variable definitions
rg --type scss "primary-(light|main)"

# Search for any color contrast related comments or documentation
rg --type scss "contrast|WCAG|accessibility"

Length of output: 144


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for CSS/SCSS files containing color definitions
rg -t css -t sass "primary-(light|main)"

# Search for any color contrast related comments or documentation in CSS/SCSS files
rg -t css -t sass "contrast|WCAG|accessibility"

# Find all CSS/SCSS files that might contain color variables
fd -e css -e scss -e sass | xargs cat

Length of output: 101131


16-16: Verify consistent usage of new semantic variables

The changes to semantic variable names (--border-color-1 and --background-light) improve maintainability. Let's verify these variables are used consistently across the codebase.

Also applies to: 22-22

✅ Verification successful

CSS variable changes are consistently applied

The verification shows that the new semantic variables are being used consistently:

  • --border-color-1 is widely used across the codebase for borders
  • --background-light is properly used in the component and across other parts of the application
  • No instances of the old variables (--bg-gray-lighten-015 or similar) were found
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent usage of new semantic variables

# Check for any mixed usage of old and new variable patterns
rg --type scss "var\(--bg-gray-(darken|lighten)" 
rg --type scss "var\(--background-(light|main)"
rg --type scss "var\(--border-color-[0-9])"

Length of output: 307


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent usage of new semantic variables with corrected syntax

# Check for any mixed usage of old and new variable patterns
rg "var\(--bg-gray-(darken|lighten)" --type css
rg "var\(--background-(light|main))" --type css
rg "var\(--border-color-[0-9]\)" --type css

# Also search in .scss files directly since some environments might not recognize the scss type
find . -name "*.scss" -type f -exec grep -l "var(--bg-gray-\|var(--background-\|var(--border-color-" {} \;

Length of output: 14737


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for the background variable usage with fixed syntax
rg "var\(--background-light\)" 
rg "var\(--bg-gray-lighten-015\)"

# Also check specifically in the component's directory for any remaining old variables
rg "var\(--bg-gray-(darken|lighten)" ./app/components/partner/client-uploads-stat-chart/

Length of output: 3116

app/components/partner/client-uploads-list/index.scss (5)

9-9: LGTM! Color variable updates align with design system changes

The updates to border and background colors follow the new standardized color system, maintaining consistency with other components.

Also applies to: 18-18


24-24: LGTM! Consistent border color usage

The border color update maintains consistency with the table's main border.


60-60: LGTM! Consistent neutral background color

The app icon background color aligns with other neutral backgrounds in the component.


67-67: LGTM! Improved text color hierarchy

The color updates establish a clear visual hierarchy:

  • Secondary text (file IDs, keys, upload info) uses --text-secondary
  • Version value uses --neutral-grey-900 for better emphasis

Also applies to: 71-71, 84-84, 88-88, 92-92


124-127: LGTM! Appropriate empty state styling

The color choices for the empty state are well-considered:

  • Neutral background and border maintain consistency
  • Medium grey text appropriately conveys the inactive nature of the empty state
app/styles/_theme.scss (1)

Line range hint 121-123: Verify usage before removing the deprecated variable.

The --neutral-white-100 variable is marked for removal. Let's verify if it's safe to remove by checking for any remaining usage in the codebase.

app/styles/_component-variables.scss (4)

405-407: LGTM: Consistent variable renaming from risk to severity

The renaming from --risk-medium to --severity-medium follows the new naming convention correctly.


408-410: LGTM: Appropriate renaming of high and critical risk variables

The renaming from --risk-high and --risk-critical to their respective --severity-* counterparts maintains consistency with the new naming convention.


413-414: LGTM: Consistent renaming of passed risk variable

The renaming from --risk-passed to --severity-passed aligns with the new naming convention.


650-650: LGTM: Improved color semantic naming

The change from --black-700 to --neutral-grey-700 improves color semantic naming while maintaining the same visual effect.

Copy link

cypress bot commented Nov 27, 2024

Irene    Run #530

Run Properties:  status check failed Failed #530  •  git commit 1999749d9c ℹ️: Merge 4fb2538e74ae7fc2854ce56a18912c7d08be20d7 into dcbcb1ebcb89c2644ee78ea7836f...
Project Irene
Branch Review PD-1602-remove-deprecated-theme-css-file
Run status status check failed Failed #530
Run duration 05m 10s
Commit git commit 1999749d9c ℹ️: Merge 4fb2538e74ae7fc2854ce56a18912c7d08be20d7 into dcbcb1ebcb89c2644ee78ea7836f...
Committer Avi Shah
View all properties for this run ↗︎

Test results
Tests that failed  Failures 1
Tests that were flaky  Flaky 0
Tests that did not run due to a developer annotating a test with .skip  Pending 0
Tests that did not run due to a failure in a mocha hook  Skipped 0
Tests that passed  Passing 31
View all changes introduced in this branch ↗︎

Tests for review

Failed  cypress/tests/dynamic-scan.spec.ts • 1 failed test

View Output

Test Artifacts
Dynamic Scan > it tests dynamic scan for an ipa file: 58061 Test Replay Screenshots

@future-pirate-king future-pirate-king force-pushed the PD-1602-remove-deprecated-theme-css-file branch from 4fb2538 to d852d4b Compare November 29, 2024 05:22
Copy link

cloudflare-workers-and-pages bot commented Nov 29, 2024

Deploying irenestaging with  Cloudflare Pages  Cloudflare Pages

Latest commit: d852d4b
Status: ✅  Deploy successful!
Preview URL: https://dc222331.irenestaging.pages.dev
Branch Preview URL: https://pd-1602-remove-deprecated-th.irenestaging.pages.dev

View logs

@future-pirate-king future-pirate-king merged commit d501220 into develop Nov 29, 2024
7 checks passed
@future-pirate-king future-pirate-king deleted the PD-1602-remove-deprecated-theme-css-file branch November 29, 2024 07:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants