fix: ak divider vertical width issue #1514
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces a series of modifications across various components, focusing on enhancing the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Tip CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Deploying irenestaging with
|
| Latest commit: |
e16aa67
|
| Status: | ✅ Deploy successful! |
| Preview URL: | https://15462ced.irenestaging.pages.dev |
| Branch Preview URL: | https://ak-divider-vertical-width-is.irenestaging.pages.dev |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (6)
app/components/app-monitoring/settings/index.hbs (1)
43-43: Check spelling inheader-app-moitoring-page-height.
Consider renaming it toheader-app-monitoring-page-heightfor readability and consistency.app/components/file-compare/header/index.hbs (1)
24-29: New local classproject-overview.
This addition cleanly separates styling concerns. Make sure to keep naming consistent with other feature areas for maintainability.app/components/project-list/header/index.hbs (1)
131-135: **Vertical divider usage **Using
@direction='vertical'onAkDivideris a great approach to unify styling. Consider removing the localdividerclass if it’s only controlling spacing, or rename it more descriptively to clarify its function. This would keep the codebase cleaner.app/components/security/analysis-list/index.scss (1)
41-43: **Maintain consistent naming across filters **
.analyses-filteris descriptive, but consider standardizing the filter class naming across different components (e.g.,.home-page-header-height,.analyses-filter) for a uniform codebase convention.app/components/file-compare/header/index.scss (1)
20-22: Consider removing the !important flagWhile the change from background-color to border-color aligns with the vertical divider fix, the
!importantflag should be avoided unless absolutely necessary as it makes styles harder to maintain and override when needed.- border-color: var(--file-compare-header-divider-background-color) !important; + border-color: var(--file-compare-header-divider-background-color);app/components/sbom/app-list/header/index.hbs (1)
Line range hint
1-1: Consider centralizing divider stylesThe changes show a pattern of standardizing divider styling across multiple components. Consider creating a shared CSS module or extending the
AkDividercomponent to handle these common styles, reducing duplication and improving maintainability.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (14)
app/components/app-monitoring/settings/index.hbs(2 hunks)app/components/app-monitoring/settings/index.scss(1 hunks)app/components/file-compare/compare-list/skeleton-loader/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/file-compare/compare-list/skeleton-loader/index.scss(1 hunks)app/components/file-compare/header/index.hbs(4 hunks)app/components/file-compare/header/index.scss(1 hunks)app/components/project-list/header/index.hbs(2 hunks)app/components/project-list/header/index.scss(1 hunks)app/components/sbom/app-list/header/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/sbom/app-list/header/index.scss(1 hunks)app/components/security/analysis-list/index.hbs(2 hunks)app/components/security/analysis-list/index.scss(1 hunks)app/components/storeknox/inventory/pending-review/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/styles/_component-variables.scss(0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- app/styles/_component-variables.scss
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- app/components/storeknox/inventory/pending-review/index.hbs
- app/components/file-compare/compare-list/skeleton-loader/index.scss
🔇 Additional comments (14)
app/components/file-compare/compare-list/skeleton-loader/index.hbs (2)
19-19: Consistent usage of local-class='header'.
The introduced local class looks appropriate for styling and naming consistency.
26-26: Confirm layout for vertical divider.
Switching to a vertical divider aligns with the PR’s objective to fix vertical width issues. Make sure the parent’s layout correctly accounts for the divider’s vertical space.
app/components/security/analysis-list/index.hbs (2)
7-7: Local class analyses-filter introduced.
This new class name is adequately descriptive for styling the filter section.
47-47: Vertical divider introduced.
The divider’s orientation change appears consistent with the wider styling updates.
app/components/app-monitoring/settings/index.hbs (1)
79-79: Vertical divider with dark color.
This is consistent with the rest of the application’s divider changes. Ensure the color choice aligns with the overall design scheme.
app/components/file-compare/header/index.hbs (3)
49-49: First vertical divider update.
Matches the pull request’s stated objective of standardizing vertical dividers.
60-60: Second vertical divider update.
Double-check that the vertical alignment suits all possible project name lengths.
73-73: Third vertical divider update.
No issues found; looks consistent with the preceding divider changes.
app/components/project-list/header/index.hbs (1)
55-55: **Consistent height for the filter row **
The new local class home-page-header-height sets a consistent 32px height for the filter row. This aligns well with the height applied in similar components, promoting UI consistency.
app/components/security/analysis-list/index.scss (1)
45-45: **Divider margin check **
.divider now provides only a margin-left. Ensure the new spacing meets design specifications across all usage scenarios.
✅ Verification successful
Let's analyze the .divider usage across the codebase. I can see several instances where .divider is used, and I notice a pattern in similar components:
- In header components (
project-list/header,sbom/app-list/header,security/analysis-list/index.scss), they all consistently usemargin-left: 0.714em - Other components have different styling based on their specific needs:
- Some use it as vertical dividers with specific heights (30px, 34px, etc.)
- Some define specific widths (90%, 75%, 100%)
- Some have border-related styles
Since the component in question (security/analysis-list) follows the same pattern as other header components with the same margin-left: 0.714em, and this appears to be a consistent design pattern across similar components, I can make a determination.
Divider margin is consistent with design patterns
The .divider class in security/analysis-list follows the established pattern used in other header components, maintaining a consistent margin-left: 0.714em. This spacing aligns with the design system's header component specifications.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify if `.divider` usage is consistent across the codebase.
# Looking for .divider usage references
rg -A 3 $'\.divider'
Length of output: 10968
app/components/sbom/app-list/header/index.scss (1)
13-13: **Height difference check **
.header-sbom-page-sorting-filter is set to 52px, while other filter headers in the codebase often use 32px. Confirm this difference is intentional for the SBOM pages rather than an accidental mismatch.
✅ Verification successful
Let me search for other header heights in the codebase.
Height difference is intentional
Based on the search results, I can see that header heights vary across different components in the codebase:
- SBOM header: 52px (app/components/sbom/app-list/header/index.scss)
- Project list header: 32px (app/components/project-list/header/index.scss)
- File overview header: 32px (app/components/file-overview/header/index.scss)
The SBOM header appears to be intentionally taller to accommodate its specific UI requirements, while other list headers maintain a standard 32px height. This height difference is likely deliberate rather than accidental.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Identify all filter classes and compare size definitions to confirm consistency.
rg -A 3 "(filter|header.*height|sorting-filter)"
Length of output: 81115
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for height definitions in SCSS files
rg -g "*.scss" "height:\s*\d+px"
Length of output: 16859
app/components/project-list/header/index.scss (1)
46-48: **New class introduction looks good **
The .home-page-header-height class with a fixed height of 32px aligns with the design system used elsewhere. No issues observed.
app/components/file-compare/header/index.scss (1)
16-18: LGTM: Project overview height standardization
The fixed height helps maintain consistent layout across the file comparison header.
app/components/sbom/app-list/header/index.hbs (1)
83-83: LGTM: Explicit vertical direction for divider
The explicit direction property helps ensure consistent divider orientation and aligns with the PR's objective.
avzz-19
force-pushed
the
ak-divider-vertical-width-issue
branch
from
2b664da to
aa4038c
Compare
github-actions
bot
requested a deployment
to
irenestorybook (Preview)
avzz-19
force-pushed
the
ak-divider-vertical-width-issue
branch
from
aa4038c to
a1e9bda
Compare
avzz-19
force-pushed
the
ak-divider-vertical-width-issue
branch
from
a1e9bda to
c16381b
Compare
Irene
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Project |
Irene
|
| Branch Review |
ak-divider-vertical-width-issue
|
| Run status |
|
| Run duration | 14m 35s |
| Commit |
|
| Committer | Avi Shah |
| View all properties for this run ↗︎ | |
| Test results | |
|---|---|
Failures
|
2
|
Flaky
|
0
|
Pending
|
0
|
Skipped
|
0
|
Passing
|
30
|
Upgrade your plan to view test results. | |
| View all changes introduced in this branch ↗︎ | |
Tests for review
avzz-19
force-pushed
the
ak-divider-vertical-width-issue
branch
from
c16381b to
e16aa67
Compare
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/index.hbs (2)
Line range hint
34-77: Validate local-class usage for consistent spacing and alignment.The newly introduced
<AkStack @spacing='1.5' @alignItems='center'>provides a neat layout for pagination controls. However, ensure that thelocal-class='counter-container'and any nested@spacingattributes align with your UI guidelines. Using consistent spacing values or design tokens across stacks improves maintainability and readability.
78-78: Use unified tokens or variables for divider styling.The vertical divider with
@height='30px'and@color='dark'is straightforward and aligns with the newAkDividerenhancements. For a more maintainable approach, consider extracting color and dimension values as design tokens or SCSS variables shared across the application. This helps ensure a unified and easily adjustable branding.app/components/ak-divider/index.hbs (1)
6-6: Consider providing fallback styles or validations for missing dimensions.
Ifthis.widthorthis.heightare not set, ensure that the component still renders in a safe default style to avoid layout regressions.app/components/ak-divider/index.stories.js (2)
60-60: Remind users that the parent container must accommodate the divider.
Because the divider is rendered as vertical in a flexible layout, ensure that the flex container is sufficiently high to display the full divider without clipping.
75-76: Adjust large default values in stories if needed.
A defaultheightof'200px'might cause confusion for typical usage scenarios. Consider smaller defaults to demonstrate a more common use case.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (20)
app/components/ak-divider/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/ak-divider/index.stories.js(2 hunks)app/components/ak-divider/index.ts(2 hunks)app/components/app-monitoring/settings/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/app-monitoring/settings/index.scss(0 hunks)app/components/file-compare/compare-list/skeleton-loader/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/file-compare/compare-list/skeleton-loader/index.scss(0 hunks)app/components/file-compare/header/index.hbs(3 hunks)app/components/file-compare/header/index.scss(1 hunks)app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/edit-analysis-button/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/findings/index.hbs(2 hunks)app/components/project-list/header/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/project-list/header/index.scss(0 hunks)app/components/sbom/app-list/header/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/sbom/app-list/header/index.scss(0 hunks)app/components/security/analysis-list/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/security/analysis-list/index.scss(0 hunks)app/components/storeknox/inventory/pending-review/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/storeknox/inventory/pending-review/index.scss(0 hunks)app/styles/_component-variables.scss(0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (7)
- app/components/storeknox/inventory/pending-review/index.scss
- app/components/file-compare/compare-list/skeleton-loader/index.scss
- app/components/project-list/header/index.scss
- app/components/sbom/app-list/header/index.scss
- app/components/app-monitoring/settings/index.scss
- app/components/security/analysis-list/index.scss
- app/styles/_component-variables.scss
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (8)
- app/components/file-compare/header/index.hbs
- app/components/storeknox/inventory/pending-review/index.hbs
- app/components/file-compare/compare-list/skeleton-loader/index.hbs
- app/components/security/analysis-list/index.hbs
- app/components/project-list/header/index.hbs
- app/components/app-monitoring/settings/index.hbs
- app/components/sbom/app-list/header/index.hbs
- app/components/file-compare/header/index.scss
🔇 Additional comments (5)
app/components/file-details/vulnerability-analysis-details/edit-analysis-button/index.hbs (1)
3-4: Looks good! Ensure consistency with wider design guidelines.
The usage of @direction='vertical', @height='32px', and @color='dark' aligns with the styling updates across the application. However, double-check that these properties match any design tokens or style guides in place to maintain consistency across all instances of AkDivider.
app/components/ak-divider/index.ts (3)
10-11: Great addition of optional props.
Allowing users to specify custom height and width provides needed flexibility.
20-23: Validate custom height for vertical orientation.
If an extremely large or an incompatible value is provided, it might cause layout shifts. Consider adding checks or safe defaults.
25-27: Validate custom width for horizontal orientation.
Similar to height, large or improper values could break layouts; consider safe-guarding.
app/components/ak-divider/index.stories.js (1)
62-62: Attributes align well with the new dimension props.
This usage showcases how to pass height and width explicitly.
No description provided.