Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

idleTimeout operator to use io.servicetalk.concurrent.Executor #1234

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 1, 2020

Conversation

Scottmitch
Copy link
Member

Motivation:
Publisher, Single, and Completable have a idleTimeout operator which
accepts a io.servicetalk.concurrent.api.Executor to implement the
underlying timeout. However the implementation only requires the
io.servicetalk.concurrent.Executor interface.

Motivation:

  • Change Publisher, Single, and Completable idleTimeout method to accept
    a io.servicetalk.concurrent.Executor instead of
    io.servicetalk.concurrent.api.Executor.

Result:
Less complex type required for idleTimeout operator.

Motivation:
Publisher, Single, and Completable have a idleTimeout operator which
accepts a io.servicetalk.concurrent.api.Executor to implement the
underlying timeout. However the implementation only requires the
io.servicetalk.concurrent.Executor interface.

Motivation:
- Change Publisher, Single, and Completable idleTimeout method to accept
a io.servicetalk.concurrent.Executor instead of
io.servicetalk.concurrent.api.Executor.

Result:
Less complex type required for idleTimeout operator.
@Scottmitch Scottmitch merged commit bd945ac into apple:main Dec 1, 2020
@Scottmitch Scottmitch deleted the timeout_api branch December 1, 2020 23:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants