Allow no SP after status-code for HTTP/1.x responses #2247
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Motivation:
While RFC7230, section 3.1.2
(https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7230#section-3.1.2) requires a
SP
before areason-phrase
, even if it's an empty phrase, manyimplementations don't include that
SP
character. Many clients parse aresponse without trailing
SP
character with no error. Thoseimplementations are:
Moreover, neither HTTP/2 nor HTTP/3 support reason-phrase. For this
reasons, many HTTP/1.x implementations (Tomcat, Rust, etc.) decided to
drop including the reason-phrase in serialized response for performance
reasons. Instead, they use the reason-phrase defined by RFC for all
known status codes and use
Unknown
for non-standard status codes.Modifications:
HttpObjectDecoder
: secondSP
is optional forHttpResponseDecoder
;Result:
ServiceTalk HttpClient parses responses with no
SP
after status code.Example:
HTTP/1.1 200\r\n
.