Skip to content

Conversation

@Lukasa
Copy link
Contributor

@Lukasa Lukasa commented Dec 4, 2018

Motivation:

We'd done all our development against newer copies of nghttp2, that
behaved a bit differently. We should support Ubuntu's copy, at least
while nghttp2 is relevant to us.

Modifications:

  • Shimmed over a version difference.
  • Fixed the tests to stop relying on differences.
  • Removed the Swift 4.0.3 dockerfiles as we don't support Swift
    4.0 anyway.

Result:

Users can build against Ubuntu 16.04's nghttp2 package.

Motivation:

We'd done all our development against newer copies of nghttp2, that
behaved a bit differently. We should support Ubuntu's copy, at least
while nghttp2 is relevant to us.

Modifications:

- Shimmed over a version difference.
- Fixed the tests to stop relying on differences.
- Removed the Swift 4.0.3 dockerfiles as we don't support Swift
  4.0 anyway.

Result:

Users can build against Ubuntu 16.04's nghttp2 package.
@Lukasa Lukasa requested review from tomerd and weissi December 4, 2018 14:07
args:
ubuntu_version : "16.04"
swift_version : "4.0.3"
install_nghttp2_from_source: "true"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why are we removing the whole docker yamls here?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ah, we don't support 4.0 :)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Because we don't support Swift 4.0, and never have. This is mentioned in the commit message.

Copy link
Member

@weissi weissi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

awesome, looks good to me!

@Lukasa Lukasa merged commit f1d8754 into apple:master Dec 4, 2018
@Lukasa Lukasa deleted the cb-ubuntu-16-04 branch December 4, 2018 14:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants