Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Correct allocation test script #2956

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Oct 31, 2024
Merged

Conversation

PeterAdams-A
Copy link
Contributor

Motivation:

Unfortunately the current script has a bug meaning it can never fail.

Modifications:

Change bracketing for output search.

Result:

Allocation tests will flag when failing

Motivation:

Unfortunately the current script has a bug meaning it can never fail.

Modifications:

Change bracketing for output search.

Result:

Allocation tests will flag when failing
@PeterAdams-A PeterAdams-A added the semver/none No version bump required. label Oct 30, 2024
@PeterAdams-A PeterAdams-A enabled auto-merge (squash) October 30, 2024 15:39
@PeterAdams-A PeterAdams-A merged commit e1d0d21 into apple:main Oct 31, 2024
41 of 43 checks passed
Lukasa pushed a commit to Lukasa/swift-nio that referenced this pull request Nov 21, 2024
Motivation:

Unfortunately the current script has a bug meaning it can never fail.

Modifications:

Change bracketing for output search.

Result:

Allocation tests will flag when failing

(cherry picked from commit e1d0d21)
Lukasa added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 21, 2024
Motivation:

Unfortunately the current script has a bug meaning it can never fail.

Modifications:

Change bracketing for output search.

Result:

Allocation tests will flag when failing

(cherry picked from commit e1d0d21)

Co-authored-by: Peter Adams <63288215+PeterAdams-A@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
semver/none No version bump required.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants