Remove duplicate implementation of .instrument #288
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
The broken build for this PR highlighted the problem reported in #289 |
This was referenced May 9, 2017
This change relies on the logic on Appsignal::Transaction.instrument rather than rely on a separate implementation in Appsignal.instrument. Now the implementations can no longer diverge from one other like what happened here.
tombruijn
force-pushed
the
simplify-appsignal-instrument
branch
from
9fdb3f8 to
5243895
Compare
|
Closing. will pick up later |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This change relies on the logic on Appsignal::Transaction.instrument
rather than rely on a separate implementation in Appsignal.instrument.
Now the implementations can no longer diverge from one other like what
happened here.