Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: Remove unreadCommentThreads #33905

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 3, 2024
Merged

Conversation

sharat87
Copy link
Member

@sharat87 sharat87 commented Jun 2, 2024

Not removing this field from Cypress test resources, so that we continue to test with past export files.

/test all

Tip

🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉
Workflow run: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/9344945556
Commit: b97cece
Cypress dashboard url: Click here!

@github-actions github-actions bot added the skip-changelog Adding this label to a PR prevents it from being listed in the changelog label Jun 2, 2024
@sharat87 sharat87 added ok-to-test Required label for CI and removed ok-to-test Required label for CI labels Jun 3, 2024
@sharat87 sharat87 marked this pull request as ready for review June 3, 2024 07:26
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 3, 2024

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The recent changes involve the removal of the unreadCommentThreads property from both the UpdateApplicationResponse interface in the frontend and the Application class in the backend. This alteration simplifies the data structure and response objects related to application updates by eliminating the now-unnecessary property.

Changes

Files Change Summary
app/client/src/ce/api/ApplicationApi.tsx Removed the unreadCommentThreads property from the UpdateApplicationResponse interface.
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/domains/Application.java Removed the unreadCommentThreads field annotated with @Transient and @JsonView(Views.Public.class).

Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6d8c38f and b97cece.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • app/client/src/ce/api/ApplicationApi.tsx (1 hunks)
  • app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/domains/Application.java (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/domains/Application.java
Additional context used
Biome
app/client/src/ce/api/ApplicationApi.tsx

[error] 168-168: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.


[error] 177-177: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.


[error] 281-500: Avoid classes that contain only static members.


[error] 307-307: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.


[error] 308-308: Template literals are preferred over string concatenation.


[error] 314-314: Template literals are preferred over string concatenation.


[error] 320-320: Template literals are preferred over string concatenation.


[error] 335-335: Template literals are preferred over string concatenation.


[error] 371-371: Template literals are preferred over string concatenation.


[error] 377-377: Template literals are preferred over string concatenation.


[error] 384-388: Template literals are preferred over string concatenation.


[error] 424-424: Template literals are preferred over string concatenation.


[error] 439-439: Template literals are preferred over string concatenation.


[error] 454-454: Template literals are preferred over string concatenation.

Additional comments not posted (2)
app/client/src/ce/api/ApplicationApi.tsx (2)

Line range hint 308-308: Use template literals instead of string concatenation for better readability and performance.
[REFACTOR_SUGGESTion]

- ApplicationApi.baseURL + "/home?workspaceId=" + workspaceId
+ `${ApplicationApi.baseURL}/home?workspaceId=${workspaceId}`

Also applies to: 314-314, 320-320, 335-335, 371-371, 377-377, 384-388, 424-424, 439-439, 454-454


Line range hint 168-168: The removal of unreadCommentThreads from UpdateApplicationResponse aligns with the PR's objectives and does not introduce any immediate issues.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
app/client/src/ce/api/ApplicationApi.tsx (2)

Line range hint 168-168: Replace any type with more specific types to improve type safety.

- Promise<any>
+ Promise<SpecificType> // Replace `SpecificType` with the actual expected type

Also applies to: 177-177, 307-307


Line range hint 281-500: Consider refactoring the ApplicationApi class to avoid a class that only contains static methods. This could potentially be a utility module.

@sharat87 sharat87 merged commit dd38743 into release Jun 3, 2024
118 of 119 checks passed
@sharat87 sharat87 deleted the chore/no-unread-comment-threads branch June 3, 2024 07:45
nidhi-nair added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 4, 2024
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Nov 14, 2024
2 tasks
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Nov 26, 2024
2 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ok-to-test Required label for CI skip-changelog Adding this label to a PR prevents it from being listed in the changelog
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants