feat: Added zone component to UQI #35316
Conversation
WalkthroughThis update introduces two new React functional components, Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User as User
participant Zone as Zone Component
participant Section as Section Component
User->>Zone: Select layout (single/double column)
Zone->>Section: Render sections based on layout
Section-->>Zone: Display content
Zone-->>User: Show updated layout
Assessment against linked issues
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
github-actions
bot
added
Enhancement
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (2)
app/client/src/pages/Editor/ActionForm/Zone/index.tsx (1)
9-14: Nicely implemented component!The
Zonecomponent is correctly implemented, applying styles based on thelayoutprop.Consider adding PropTypes for runtime type checking.
import PropTypes from 'prop-types'; Zone.propTypes = { children: PropTypes.node.isRequired, layout: PropTypes.oneOf(['single-column', 'double-column']), };app/client/src/pages/Editor/ActionForm/Section/index.tsx (1)
9-18: Nicely implemented component!The
Sectioncomponent is correctly implemented, applying styles based on theisStandaloneprop.Consider adding PropTypes for runtime type checking.
import PropTypes from 'prop-types'; Section.propTypes = { children: PropTypes.node.isRequired, isStandalone: PropTypes.bool, };
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (5)
- app/client/src/pages/Editor/ActionForm/Section/index.tsx (1 hunks)
- app/client/src/pages/Editor/ActionForm/Section/styles.module.css (1 hunks)
- app/client/src/pages/Editor/ActionForm/Zone/index.tsx (1 hunks)
- app/client/src/pages/Editor/ActionForm/Zone/styles.module.css (1 hunks)
- app/client/src/pages/Editor/ActionForm/index.ts (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- app/client/src/pages/Editor/ActionForm/Section/styles.module.css
- app/client/src/pages/Editor/ActionForm/index.ts
Additional comments not posted (10)
app/client/src/pages/Editor/ActionForm/Zone/index.tsx (3)
1-2: Good job with the imports!The necessary imports for React and the CSS module are correctly included.
4-7: Well-defined interface!The
ZonePropsinterface is correctly defined withchildrenand an optionallayoutprop.
17-17: Correct export statement!The
Zonecomponent is correctly exported.app/client/src/pages/Editor/ActionForm/Section/index.tsx (3)
1-2: Good job with the imports!The necessary imports for React and the CSS module are correctly included.
4-7: Well-defined interface!The
SectionPropsinterface is correctly defined withchildrenand an optionalisStandaloneprop.
20-20: Correct export statement!The
Sectioncomponent is correctly exported.app/client/src/pages/Editor/ActionForm/Zone/styles.module.css (4)
1-6: Well-defined base styles!The
.zoneclass is correctly defined with grid layout and spacing.
8-10: Good implementation of double-column layout!The double-column layout is correctly defined with a grid template of two columns.
12-14: Good implementation of single-column layout!The single-column layout is correctly defined with a grid template of one column.
16-20: Effective use of media query!The media query correctly collapses the double-column layout into a single column when the width is below 531px.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (2)
app/client/src/pages/Editor/ActionForm/Zone/index.tsx (1)
1-7: Consider adding documentation comments to theZonePropsinterface.Adding documentation comments will improve the readability and maintainability of the code by providing context for each prop.
+ /** + * Props for the Zone component. + * @property {React.ReactNode} children - The content to be displayed within the zone. + * @property {"single-column" | "double-column"} [layout="single-column"] - The layout style of the zone. + */ interface ZoneProps { children: React.ReactNode; layout?: "single-column" | "double-column"; }app/client/src/pages/Editor/ActionForm/Section/index.tsx (1)
1-7: Consider adding documentation comments to theSectionPropsinterface.Adding documentation comments will improve the readability and maintainability of the code by providing context for each prop.
+ /** + * Props for the Section component. + * @property {React.ReactNode} children - The content to be displayed within the section. + * @property {boolean} [isStandalone=false] - Indicates if the section is standalone. + */ interface SectionProps { children: React.ReactNode; isStandalone?: boolean; }
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (5)
- app/client/src/pages/Editor/ActionForm/Section/index.tsx (1 hunks)
- app/client/src/pages/Editor/ActionForm/Section/styles.module.css (1 hunks)
- app/client/src/pages/Editor/ActionForm/Zone/index.tsx (1 hunks)
- app/client/src/pages/Editor/ActionForm/Zone/styles.module.css (1 hunks)
- app/client/src/pages/Editor/ActionForm/index.ts (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- app/client/src/pages/Editor/ActionForm/Section/styles.module.css
- app/client/src/pages/Editor/ActionForm/index.ts
Additional comments not posted (7)
app/client/src/pages/Editor/ActionForm/Zone/index.tsx (2)
17-17: LGTM!The export statement is correct.
9-14: Verify the usage of thedata-layoutattribute.Ensure that the
data-layoutattribute is used consistently and correctly within the CSS and other parts of the codebase.Verification successful
Let's correct the file type and re-run the search to verify the usage of the
data-layoutattribute.
The usage of the
data-layoutattribute is consistent and correct.The attribute is utilized in multiple CSS files for styling and in another TypeScript file, confirming its appropriate usage.
app/client/src/widgets/wds/WDSTableWidget/component/TableHeader/index.tsxapp/client/src/widgets/wds/WDSTableWidget/component/TableHeader/styles.module.cssapp/client/src/pages/Editor/ActionForm/Zone/styles.module.cssScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the `data-layout` attribute. # Test: Search for the `data-layout` attribute usage. Expect: Consistent and correct usage. rg --type css --type tsx 'data-layout'Length of output: 66
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the `data-layout` attribute. # Test: Search for the `data-layout` attribute usage. Expect: Consistent and correct usage. rg --type css --type ts 'data-layout'Length of output: 1007
app/client/src/pages/Editor/ActionForm/Section/index.tsx (2)
20-20: LGTM!The export statement is correct.
9-18: Verify the usage of thedata-standaloneattribute.Ensure that the
data-standaloneattribute is used consistently and correctly within the CSS and other parts of the codebase.Verification successful
Let's correct the file type and re-run the script to ensure we capture the usage of the
data-standaloneattribute accurately.
The usage of the
data-standaloneattribute is consistent and correct.The attribute is styled appropriately in the CSS file and applied dynamically in the
Sectioncomponent.
app/client/src/pages/Editor/ActionForm/Section/styles.module.cssapp/client/src/pages/Editor/ActionForm/Section/index.tsxScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the `data-standalone` attribute. # Test: Search for the `data-standalone` attribute usage. Expect: Consistent and correct usage. rg --type css --type tsx 'data-standalone'Length of output: 70
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the `data-standalone` attribute. # Test: Search for the `data-standalone` attribute usage. Expect: Consistent and correct usage. rg --type css --type ts 'data-standalone'Length of output: 504
app/client/src/pages/Editor/ActionForm/Zone/styles.module.css (3)
1-6: LGTM!The base styles for the
.zoneclass are correct and follow best practices.
8-10: LGTM!The styles for the double-column layout are correct and follow best practices.
12-20: LGTM!The styles for the single-column layout and responsive behavior are correct and follow best practices.
|
@albinAppsmith Can we also add unit test here if possible? |
@sagar-qa007 This is a visual component. I feel writing unit test for this doesn't make sense. |
…o responsive-uqi-zone
…o responsive-uqi-zone
albinAppsmith
added
ok-to-test
Description
Added zone component to the UQI. This component will maintain the single and double column layout.
Fixes #35214
Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Sanity"
🔍 Cypress test results
Tip
🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉
Workflow run: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10193706753
Commit: e4bc652
Cypress dashboard.
Tags:
@tag.SanitySpec:
Thu, 01 Aug 2024 07:35:05 UTC
Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
Summary by CodeRabbit
Sectioncomponent for modular UI design, facilitating easy integration of standalone and non-standalone sections.Zonecomponent to manage layout options with single-column and double-column formats, enhancing layout flexibility.SectionandZonecomponents improve styling and responsiveness across different screen sizes.SectionandZonefunctionalities.