test:Fix canvas context prop01

[NandanAnantharamu]

EE PR: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith-ee/pull/5159

RCA:
The property section related validations were not working

Solution:

Enhanced verification of property pane section visibility using accessibility attributes.
Introduced new UI interaction properties for managing collapsible sections.

/ok-to-test tags="@tag.IDE"

Tip

🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉
Workflow run: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10923368993
Commit: c996a38
Cypress dashboard.
Tags: @tag.IDE
Spec:

---

Wed, 18 Sep 2024 14:10:07 UTC

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features

  • Improved test logic for verifying the state of property pane sections, enhancing accessibility compliance.
  • Updated limited tests to include new test specifications for the property pane.

• Bug Fixes

  • Enhanced robustness of tests by refining visibility state checks using ARIA attributes.

• Chores

  • Expanded locator capabilities in the testing framework to support new UI components related to collapsible sections.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve updates to Cypress test files, enhancing the logic for verifying property pane sections. The tests now utilize the aria-hidden attribute for state verification instead of relying on DOM structure checks. Additionally, the list of limited tests has been modified to include a new test file. Two new properties have also been added to the CommonLocators class to improve element targeting for collapsible sections.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
app/client/cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/IDE/Canvas_Context_Property_Pane_1_spec.js	Updated logic for verifying property pane sections using aria-hidden instead of DOM checks.
app/client/cypress/limited-tests.txt	Replaced Fork_Template_spec.js with Canvas_Context_Property_Pane_1_spec.js in limited tests.
app/client/cypress/support/Objects/CommonLocators.ts	Added _propertyCollapseBody and _propertyCollapse properties to enhance UI component targeting.

Possibly related PRs

• fix: Fixed flaky fork template test case #36200: The changes in this PR involve modifications to Cypress tests, similar to the main PR's focus on improving test logic and reliability.
• test: fix DataSourceScheme #36339: This PR also addresses enhancements in Cypress test logic, particularly in ensuring correct UI interactions, which aligns with the main PR's goal of improving test robustness.

Suggested labels

ok-to-test, Test, IDE Product, IDE Navigation

Suggested reviewers

• ApekshaBhosale
• sagar-qa007
• NandanAnantharamu

Poem

In tests where icons used to reign,
Now aria-hidden holds the gain.
With locators fresh, they seek and find,
Enhancing checks, both clear and kind.
A canvas bright, a property pane,
In Cypress tests, we’ll dance again! 🎉

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  -- @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[NandanAnantharamu]

/ci-test-limit-count run_count=25

[github-actions]

Tests running at: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10919392761.
Cypress dashboard
PR: #36391.

[github-actions]

Workflow run: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10919392761.
Cypress dashboard: Click here!
The following are new failures, please fix them before merging the PR:
To know the list of identified flaky tests - Refer here

***** Repeat Run Summary ***** Total Tests with repeat: 225 Total Passed: 225 Total Failed: 0 Total Skipped: 0 *****************************