chore: [Plugin Action Editor] Query forms in Plugin Action Form #36684
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces a new component, Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
github-actions
bot
added
IDE Pod
hetunandu
changed the title
github-actions
bot
added
the
skip-changelog
|
This PR has increased the number of cyclic dependencies by 3, when compared with the release branch. Refer this document to identify the cyclic dependencies introduced by this PR. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
app/client/src/PluginActionEditor/components/PluginActionForm/components/UQIEditorForm.tsx (1)
23-25: Let's refine our conditional logic, shall we?While your current approach works, we can make it even better! Instead of using double negation, let's use a more direct boolean check. This will make our code cleaner and easier to understand.
Here's a suggested improvement:
- if (!!formData) { + if (formData) { formEvaluationState = formEvaluation[formData.id]; }Remember, in JavaScript, objects are truthy, so we don't need the double negation. This change will make your code more readable and maintainable. Good job on considering the conditional check, though!
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 23-23: Avoid redundant double-negation.
It is not necessary to use double-negation when a value will already be coerced to a boolean.
Unsafe fix: Remove redundant double-negation(lint/complexity/noExtraBooleanCast)
app/client/src/ce/PluginActionEditor/components/PluginActionResponse/hooks/usePluginActionResponseTabs.tsx (1)
37-37: Let's ensure variable names are grammatically correct for clarityConsider renaming
pluginRequireDatasourcetopluginRequiresDatasourceto enhance readability and maintain consistency in your code.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- app/client/src/PluginActionEditor/components/PluginActionForm/PluginActionForm.tsx (1 hunks)
- app/client/src/PluginActionEditor/components/PluginActionForm/components/UQIEditorForm.tsx (1 hunks)
- app/client/src/ce/PluginActionEditor/components/PluginActionResponse/hooks/usePluginActionResponseTabs.tsx (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
app/client/src/PluginActionEditor/components/PluginActionForm/components/UQIEditorForm.tsx
[error] 23-23: Avoid redundant double-negation.
It is not necessary to use double-negation when a value will already be coerced to a boolean.
Unsafe fix: Remove redundant double-negation(lint/complexity/noExtraBooleanCast)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
app/client/src/PluginActionEditor/components/PluginActionForm/PluginActionForm.tsx (3)
8-8: Well done, class! A new import has been added.The import of
UQIEditorFormis correctly placed and follows our naming conventions. Keep up the good work!
15-15: Attention, students! We've made some adjustments to our layout.The
Flexcomponent's properties have been modified. Theflexproperty is now set to "1", and we've added anoverflowproperty set to "hidden". These changes look good, but let's make sure they don't cause any unexpected layout issues.Can you please verify that:
- The component expands properly to fill its container?
- No important content is being cut off due to the hidden overflow?
22-25: Class, let's examine our new conditional rendering!You've done a great job adding the
UQIEditorFormto our component. This aligns perfectly with our lesson plan of combining the Query Editor and API Editor forms. However, there's a small opportunity for improvement in our syntax.Let's adjust our parentheses for better readability:
- {plugin.uiComponent === UIComponentTypes.DbEditorForm || - (plugin.uiComponent === UIComponentTypes.UQIDbEditorForm && ( - <UQIEditorForm /> - ))} + {(plugin.uiComponent === UIComponentTypes.DbEditorForm || + plugin.uiComponent === UIComponentTypes.UQIDbEditorForm) && ( + <UQIEditorForm /> + )}Also, let's make sure our conditions are correct. Can you verify that:
UQIEditorFormrenders correctly for bothDbEditorFormandUQIDbEditorFormtypes?- It doesn't render for other UI component types?
app/client/src/PluginActionEditor/components/PluginActionForm/components/UQIEditorForm.tsx (4)
1-9: Well done on your import selections, class!You've demonstrated a good understanding of the required dependencies for this component. The imports are well-organized, including both internal and external modules. Keep up the good work!
11-38: Excellent work on the component structure, students!Your implementation of the UQIEditorForm component is well-organized and aligns perfectly with our lesson objectives. The use of context and selectors demonstrates a good grasp of React and Redux concepts. Keep up this level of quality in your future assignments!
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 23-23: Avoid redundant double-negation.
It is not necessary to use double-negation when a value will already be coerced to a boolean.
Unsafe fix: Remove redundant double-negation(lint/complexity/noExtraBooleanCast)
40-43: A gold star for your export statement!Your use of the reduxForm Higher-Order Component is spot-on! You've correctly set the form name and enabled reinitialization. This shows a deep understanding of Redux Form integration. Excellent work connecting your component to the Redux ecosystem!
1-43: Class, let's review our lesson on the UQIEditorForm!You've done an outstanding job implementing this new component. Your work effectively combines the Query Editor and API Editor form components, meeting our lesson objectives perfectly. The code is well-structured, follows React best practices, and integrates smoothly with our existing systems.
Here's a quick recap of what we've learned:
- Proper import organization
- Effective use of React hooks and Redux
- Clean component structure
- Correct integration with Redux Form
There's just one small area for improvement in the conditional logic, which we've addressed. Overall, this is excellent work that deserves recognition. Keep up this level of quality in your future assignments!
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 23-23: Avoid redundant double-negation.
It is not necessary to use double-negation when a value will already be coerced to a boolean.
Unsafe fix: Remove redundant double-negation(lint/complexity/noExtraBooleanCast)
| currentActionConfig={action} | ||
| isRunning={false} | ||
| onRunClick={noop} | ||
| runErrorMessage={""} // TODO |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Let's address the TODO: Implement runErrorMessage
There's a // TODO comment indicating that runErrorMessage needs implementation. Completing this will ensure users receive accurate error feedback.
Would you like assistance in providing this implementation?
hetunandu
added
ok-to-test
Description
Implement UQI Editor Form and Query Response panes
Fixes #36154
Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.IDE"
🔍 Cypress test results
Tip
🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉
Workflow run: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/11175240455
Commit: 5c0a579
Cypress dashboard.
Tags:
@tag.IDESpec:
Fri, 04 Oct 2024 07:12:01 UTC
Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
UQIEditorFormcomponent for enhanced form handling within thePluginActionForm.usePluginActionResponseTabshook to support additional plugin types and dynamic tab structures based on datasource presence.Bug Fixes
Documentation