Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Lighten yellow borders around list items #94

Open
qris opened this issue Mar 8, 2013 · 4 comments
Open

Lighten yellow borders around list items #94

qris opened this issue Mar 8, 2013 · 4 comments

Comments

@qris
Copy link
Collaborator

qris commented Mar 8, 2013

Subjectively, I find the heavy yellow borders around each item visually jarring, they make lists difficult to read.

Lightening, e.g. from FFCC00 to FFEECC, makes them less intrusive. But I think the standard for lists is to have alternating light backgrounds (e.g. white and pale yellow) instead of heavy borders around them. Please would you consider something like that?

And a yellow pony. Please daddy, please!

@jogwen
Copy link
Collaborator

jogwen commented Mar 8, 2013

I have a feeling this might be rather a contentious issue - tell you what
Chris, why don't you propose it on econsensus.org and see what everyone
thinks? I'll create a kanban card for the outcome once decided.

On 8 March 2013 10:54, Chris Wilson notifications@github.com wrote:

Subjectively, I find the heavy yellow borders around each item visually
jarring, they make lists difficult to read.

Lightening, e.g. from FFCC00 to FFEECC, makes them less intrusive. But I
think the standard for lists is to have alternating light backgrounds (e.g.
white and pale yellow) instead of heavy borders around them. Please would
you consider something like that?

And a yellow pony. Please daddy, please!


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/94
.

@jogwen
Copy link
Collaborator

jogwen commented Mar 12, 2013

Hi Chris, was there any discussion about this on econsensus?

@qris
Copy link
Collaborator Author

qris commented Mar 12, 2013

On Tue, 12 Mar 2013, jogwen wrote:

Hi Chris, was there any discussion about this on econsensus?

Yes, people said it doesn't belong on our econsensus so Tom bounced it
back. Kanban card?

Cheers, Chris.


\ / / ,() | Chris Wilson chris+sig@qwirx.com Cambs UK |
/ (/ ,/ / / \ | Security/C/C++/Java/Ruby/Perl/SQL Developer |
__/
/////__/ | We are GNU : free your mind & your software |

@jogwen
Copy link
Collaborator

jogwen commented Mar 12, 2013

Fair enough, I guess that implies consensus or ambivalence then :D https://aptivate.kanbantool.com/boards/5986-econsensus#tasks-1384007

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants