-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.4k
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
fix(report): fix error if miconfigs are empty (#5782)
- Loading branch information
1 parent
9b4bced
commit c317fe8
Showing
3 changed files
with
40 additions
and
1 deletion.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ | ||
<?xml version="1.0" ?> | ||
<testsuites name="trivy"> | ||
<testsuite tests="4" failures="4" name="testdata/fixtures/images/alpine-310.tar.gz (alpine 3.10.2)" errors="0" skipped="0" time=""> | ||
<properties> | ||
<property name="type" value="alpine"></property> | ||
</properties> | ||
<testcase classname="libcrypto1.1-1.1.1c-r0" name="[MEDIUM] CVE-2019-1549" time=""> | ||
<failure message="openssl: information disclosure in fork()" type="description">OpenSSL 1.1.1 introduced a rewritten random number generator (RNG). This was intended to include protection in the event of a fork() system call in order to ensure that the parent and child processes did not share the same RNG state. However this protection was not being used in the default case. A partial mitigation for this issue is that the output from a high precision timer is mixed into the RNG state so the likelihood of a parent and child process sharing state is significantly reduced. If an application already calls OPENSSL_init_crypto() explicitly using OPENSSL_INIT_ATFORK then this problem does not occur at all. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1d (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1c).</failure> | ||
</testcase> | ||
<testcase classname="libcrypto1.1-1.1.1c-r0" name="[MEDIUM] CVE-2019-1551" time=""> | ||
<failure message="openssl: Integer overflow in RSAZ modular exponentiation on x86_64" type="description">There is an overflow bug in the x64_64 Montgomery squaring procedure used in exponentiation with 512-bit moduli. No EC algorithms are affected. Analysis suggests that attacks against 2-prime RSA1024, 3-prime RSA1536, and DSA1024 as a result of this defect would be very difficult to perform and are not believed likely. Attacks against DH512 are considered just feasible. However, for an attack the target would have to re-use the DH512 private key, which is not recommended anyway. Also applications directly using the low level API BN_mod_exp may be affected if they use BN_FLG_CONSTTIME. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1e (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1d). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2u (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2t).</failure> | ||
</testcase> | ||
<testcase classname="libssl1.1-1.1.1c-r0" name="[MEDIUM] CVE-2019-1549" time=""> | ||
<failure message="openssl: information disclosure in fork()" type="description">OpenSSL 1.1.1 introduced a rewritten random number generator (RNG). This was intended to include protection in the event of a fork() system call in order to ensure that the parent and child processes did not share the same RNG state. However this protection was not being used in the default case. A partial mitigation for this issue is that the output from a high precision timer is mixed into the RNG state so the likelihood of a parent and child process sharing state is significantly reduced. If an application already calls OPENSSL_init_crypto() explicitly using OPENSSL_INIT_ATFORK then this problem does not occur at all. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1d (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1c).</failure> | ||
</testcase> | ||
<testcase classname="libssl1.1-1.1.1c-r0" name="[MEDIUM] CVE-2019-1551" time=""> | ||
<failure message="openssl: Integer overflow in RSAZ modular exponentiation on x86_64" type="description">There is an overflow bug in the x64_64 Montgomery squaring procedure used in exponentiation with 512-bit moduli. No EC algorithms are affected. Analysis suggests that attacks against 2-prime RSA1024, 3-prime RSA1536, and DSA1024 as a result of this defect would be very difficult to perform and are not believed likely. Attacks against DH512 are considered just feasible. However, for an attack the target would have to re-use the DH512 private key, which is not recommended anyway. Also applications directly using the low level API BN_mod_exp may be affected if they use BN_FLG_CONSTTIME. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1e (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1d). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2u (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2t).</failure> | ||
</testcase> | ||
</testsuite> | ||
<testsuite tests="0" failures="0" name="testdata/fixtures/images/alpine-310.tar.gz (alpine 3.10.2)" errors="0" skipped="0" time=""> | ||
<properties> | ||
<property name="type" value="alpine"></property> | ||
</properties> | ||
</testsuite> | ||
</testsuites> |