This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 18, 2020. It is now read-only.
I Gave - Funding Request - Perpetual Funding for Charitable Operation Costs #10
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
See the Guide for submitting a new Request for funding for further details on submitting a request
Request for Nest membership and funding (#1)
Team name: I Gave
Proof of concept / research whitepaper: https://igave.io/whitepaper.pdf
Burn rate: $0/month
Legal structure: NA / I Gave DAO
Team and roadmap
https://github.com/tenthirtyone/nest/blob/igave/grants/igave/team.md
https://github.com/tenthirtyone/nest/blob/igave/grants/igave/roadmap.md
Proposal
Raising donations for operations costs is the most challenging obstacle for charitable organizations. It's actually kind of easy matching donors with causes, but difficult to fund donations that grow the organization.
From 1970 to 2009 the number of nonprofits to cross the $50M revenue barrier is 1441. The number of for-profit was 46,136. Why are nonprofits incapable of capturing market share?
Money is the symptom. Social dogma is the problem. It is taboo to profit from helping others. The things we are taught to think about giving and philanthropy and charity undermine the causes we love. We have no problem with someone making millions of dollars selling widgets but make half a million dollars curing sick kids and you risk character assassination.
We propose a DAO and DAPP ecosystem dedicated to funding charity operation costs. All Ether raised in the token ICO will be locked and go to monthly donations specifically to grow non-profit organizations. A monthly vote by token holders will decide the non-profit recipients of the allowance. Token holders will decide which organizations are eligible to receive the allowance.
A DAPP for charitable fundraising can tokenize donations - issuing ERC-721 digital assets representing donation levels. Each donor token represents a specific act of charity or giving. E.g. "This token represents a pair of clean clothes to go to disaster relief victims" Purchasing the token funds the charity to buy that item and give it to those in need. The donor receives a permanent token certifying the donation.
The tokenizing of donations creates a commodity market for charity. Donors can 'shop' to make donations.
Furthermore, A Metamask enabled embedded HTML snippet allows Ether donations on any website. This enables anyone to create their own decentralized charitable donation page. Celebrities, brands, shops, can all pick their favorite causes and accept donations on their behalf. The button interacts directly with the DAPP smart contracts, there is no possibility of middle man fees.
After donors purchase the ERC-721 tokens to make their donation. Web3 provides donor token holders new web experiences based on their donations and token holdings. Using the token as an identity mechanism you can start building fraternities/sororities based on philanthropy. You can do anything an ERC-721 token is capable of doing. One great use case we've explored is eventually transitioning DAO control to the donors - basing DAO votes on ERC-721 giving amounts instead of token holding.
Essentially this DAO is a faucet for growing non-profits chosen by the token holders. The DAO builds DAPPs that serve the non-profit space. The DAPPs charge a small fee, adding half the monthly fee to the DAO allowance fund and the other half pays token holders for their work maintaining the DAPPs and DAO. Unspent allowance funds go back to the fund, extending the life of the DAO.
Deliverables
[Working Prototype is available: https://igave.io/demo]
[Working Prototype is available: https://igave.io/embedded/1/3]
[Planning Stage. We are still finalizing the best steps forward here]
Grant size
Funding: We don't need any funding right now. We've completed most of this work on our own and are at the stage where we are beginning to talk with non-profits. What we really need right now are partners the help grow and legitimize the project to attract more organizations and users.
Success reward: Up to $100k in ETH.
This not for operation costs, this is our minimum goal for the project launch. If, worst case, this were to be the only funds raised for this project. $80k would be slated for monthly charity allowance, 10% is an available dev fund with the remaining 10% of the dev fund being locked in a DAICO model.
To be clear on the grant money, this is not to pay ourselves. We are only seeking funds to help the project succeed. The primary motivator for our interest in the grant program is the value a partnership with Aragon and Placeholder brings.
Application requirements
Proof of Concept: https://igave.io/demo
Whitepaper https://igave.io/whitepaper.pdf
Team Members
Alex Sherbuck - Founder & Developer
Prior: Senior Developer @ Bitpay
https://www.linkedin.com/in/alexsherbuck/
Jessie Mooberry - Charity Advisor
Entrepreneur-in-Residence @ Stanford Peace Innovation Lab
https://www.linkedin.com/in/mooberry/
Daria Cuda - Business Advisor
Marketing and Business MBA
https://www.linkedin.com/in/dariacuda/
Harsha Goli - Developer
BitCraft Founder, Prior Bitpay Developer
https://www.linkedin.com/in/harshagoli/
We have one more, an ICO and solidity veteran. We are still finishing up talks and where they fit. All are committed to the project's success.
The DAO is designed to be the organization handling funds. I have an LLC that I operate under.
Development timeline
The development timeline will be the following one in regards to each deliverable:
There is currently a private testnet setup with a working demo with restricted features at https://igave.io/demo
We are presenting the project as it currently is. Even if this is not a good fit, we would love any feedback to make it better or work with Aragon to be a better fit for this program.
Thank you.
Alex Sherbuck
https://igave.io
https://github.com/I-Gave