-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
process Backlog commands without minimum delay #6562
Conversation
This brakes backward compability and for some commands a delay is necessary (rf bridge) |
what do you propose? I've no problem keeping that patch locally. I needed a solution where rules with a couple of commands are processed without noticeable delay. |
The idea for the possibility to have no delay in between backlogs commands is fine. |
Perhaps this can be set to a default of 2 and user modified from I don't think it warrants wasting a setoption location for something that would not necessarily need to be changed during runtime - I think being able to set this prior to compile would be sufficient. |
Agree |
I like the idea that have an adjustable Setoption for backlog delay time. It would be better to have the setting by ms instead of 100ms. In order to keep the backward compatibility, the default value could be 200. |
Phase 1 |
Add command SetOption34 0..255 to set backlog delay. Default value is 200 (mSeconds) (#6562)
And phase 2. Everybody happy with command SetOption34 0..255 to set backlog delay. Default stayed at 200 mSec |
@arendst You're the only one that HAS to be happy but I am sure others are also :) |
Happiness all around 😀 |
Description:
improve latency processing rules with multiple commands via Backlog
Checklist: