Triso low growth deployment setup Scenario: DAL3 #172
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
nsryan2
requested review from
ZoeRichter,
LukeSeifert,
yardasol and
RhysMacMillan
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR builds off of #170, which should be merged first, by duplicating the calculations for the low growth scenario using the greedy, rough random, and rough + greedy deployment schemes.
The low growth scenario is a 1% demand increase year-to-year starting in 2029 when the advanced reactors will begin deployment. Each deployment scheme attempts to meet this demand with pre-defined reactor models. Currently there are only Xe-100s and MMRs, this will be expanded (there is an issue #171 associated with this).