Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: improve pull request template to include kind lines in comments instead of quote #1538

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 13, 2024

Conversation

chengfang
Copy link
Contributor

What type of PR is this?
/kind chore

What does this PR do / why we need it:

Current PR template uses quote (>) to list all kind values, while it probably intend to use comments so submitters can choose the right PR kind by uncommenting a certain line.

I found the current template a bit confusing. I've seen some PR descriptions still contain all kind lines, or having the selecting kind line as quote.

With the fix in this PR, submitters just need to uncomment the right kind line, leave the rest as is, and the rendered description will only display the selected kind line, while keeping the other kind lines as hidden comments. Submitters can also choose to delete the 2 instruction lines and unused kind lines.

Have you updated the necessary documentation?

  • Documentation update is required by this PR.
  • Documentation has been updated.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #?

How to test changes / Special notes to the reviewer:

…s instead of quote

Signed-off-by: Cheng Fang <cfang@redhat.com>
Copy link
Collaborator

@svghadi svghadi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Thanks @chengfang.

@svghadi svghadi merged commit 603adda into argoproj-labs:master Sep 13, 2024
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants